Showing 161 - 180 results of 22,200 for search '(( 5 ng decrease ) OR ((( 5 point decrease ) OR ( 50 ((we decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))))', query time: 0.73s Refine Results
  1. 161

    Image_2_Relative Diazotroph Abundance in Symbiotic Red Sea Corals Decreases With Water Depth.png by Arjen Tilstra (6915227)

    Published 2019
    “…We hypothesized that relative nifH gene copy numbers would decrease with water depth, assuming a related shift from autotrophy to heterotrophy. …”
  2. 162

    Image_1_Relative Diazotroph Abundance in Symbiotic Red Sea Corals Decreases With Water Depth.tif by Arjen Tilstra (6915227)

    Published 2019
    “…We hypothesized that relative nifH gene copy numbers would decrease with water depth, assuming a related shift from autotrophy to heterotrophy. …”
  3. 163
  4. 164
  5. 165

    NgR1 KO mice exhibited an increase in excitatory synapses and a decrease in inhibitory synapses, indicating an imbalance of synaptic transmission. by Jinwei Zhang (462455)

    Published 2025
    “…The inhibitory synaptic density of NgR1 mice showed a significant decrease when compared to WT mice (***P <  0.001). …”
  6. 166
  7. 167
  8. 168
  9. 169
  10. 170
  11. 171
  12. 172

    DataSheet_1_A History of Endometriosis Is Associated With Decreased Peripheral NK Cytotoxicity and Increased Infiltration of Uterine CD68+ Macrophages.docx by Linlin Wang (289071)

    Published 2021
    “…Peripheral NK cytotoxicity at effector-to-target ratios of 25:1 and 50:1 was significantly reduced in women with a history of endometriosis from that of the control group (26.6% versus 33.3% and 36.1% versus 43.3%, respectively, both P < 0.001). …”
  13. 173

    DataSheet_1_A History of Endometriosis Is Associated With Decreased Peripheral NK Cytotoxicity and Increased Infiltration of Uterine CD68+ Macrophages.docx by Linlin Wang (289071)

    Published 2023
    “…Peripheral NK cytotoxicity at effector-to-target ratios of 25:1 and 50:1 was significantly reduced in women with a history of endometriosis from that of the control group (26.6% versus 33.3% and 36.1% versus 43.3%, respectively, both P < 0.001). …”
  14. 174
  15. 175
  16. 176
  17. 177
  18. 178
  19. 179
  20. 180