Search alternatives:
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
5 nm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 cm (Expand Search)
16 a » 16 _ (Expand Search), 19 a (Expand Search), 1 a (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
5 nm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 cm (Expand Search)
16 a » 16 _ (Expand Search), 19 a (Expand Search), 1 a (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Spatial training decreases the association between Ndfip1 and Nedd4 and decreases endogenous Beclin 1 ubiquitination in the hippocampus.
Published 2023“…Endogenous Beclin 1 ubiquitination level is decreased in Nedd4 siRNA-transfected rats (t<sub>1,6</sub> = 5.78, <i>p</i> = 0.001). …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
WT1 siRNA decreases proliferation, pAKT, and Bcl2 expression.
Published 2024“…<b>C.</b> RT-qPCR of WT1, p<0.05(*), vFLIP(ns), LANA, p<0.0001(****), K8.1, p<0.0001(****), and BCL2 p<0.05(*) in the setting of WT1 knockdown in ISLK BAC-16 with WT1 siRNA in comparison to a control siRNA using two-sided, unpaired student’s t-tests. …”
-
6
Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.
Published 2023“…<p>Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.</p>…”
-
7
Overexpressions of the AB domain of RPA70 and the β-barrel domain of Ku70 significantly decrease HBoV1 replication in HAE-ALI.
Published 2022“…Duplex HBoV1 genome was loaded as a size marker (M) of 5.5 kb. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Decreased activity of FASII favors the cold growth of the <i>ΔcshA</i> strain.
Published 2020“…<i>fapR</i> mRNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using 16S rRNA as reference gene on total RNAs extracted from <i>wt</i> strain (PR01), <i>ΔcshA</i> strain (PR01-ΔcshA), and suppressor strains <i>ΔcshA/accC</i><sup><i>M385V</i></sup> (C51), <i>ΔcshA/accC</i><sup><i>T183I</i></sup> (sup30), <i>ΔcshA/accD</i><sup><i>F253V</i></sup> (sup17), <i>ΔcshA/accD</i><sup><i>A164V</i></sup> (sup16), <i>ΔcshA/birA</i><sup><i>D320F-FsX28</i></sup> (C58), <i>ΔcshA/birA</i><sup><i>R280stop</i></sup> (sup1) and <i>ΔcshA/bioY</i><sup><i>P123R-FsX1</i></sup> (C66), all at exponential growth phase in MH medium at 25°C. n = 5 for <i>ΔcshA</i>, <i>4 for wt</i> and 3 for all others. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20