Showing 81 - 100 results of 30,447 for search '(( 5 nn decrease ) OR ((( 5 w decrease ) OR ( a ((point decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))))', query time: 0.71s Refine Results
  1. 81

    Data_Sheet_5_Chemical Similarity of Co-occurring Trees Decreases With Precipitation and Temperature in North American Forests.CSV by Brian E. Sedio (10875330)

    Published 2021
    “…Variation in metabolite richness among communities was positively correlated with species richness, but variation in mean chemical similarity was not. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that plant metabolomes play a more important role in community assembly in wetter and warmer climates, even at temperate latitudes, and suggest that metabolomic traits can provide unique insight to studies of trait-based community assembly.…”
  2. 82
  3. 83
  4. 84
  5. 85
  6. 86

    The mean and standard deviation of parameters. by Sadaf Sepasgozar Sarkhosh (20436143)

    Published 2024
    “…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
  7. 87

    Top view of the experimental setup. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
  8. 88

    Parameters of energy harvesting. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
  9. 89

    Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G<sub>y</sub> = 0. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
  10. 90

    Graph for maximum Frequency at G<sub>y</sub> = 0. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
  11. 91

    Graph for maximum Power at G<sub>y</sub> = 0. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
  12. 92

    Summary of experimentation results. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
  13. 93

    Piezoelectric eel. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
  14. 94
  15. 95
  16. 96
  17. 97
  18. 98
  19. 99

    Good things come to those who wait—Decreasing impatience for health gains and losses by Stefan A. Lipman (4724040)

    Published 2020
    “…<div><p>Historically, time preferences are modelled by assuming constant discounting, which implies a constant level of impatience. The prevailing empirical finding, however, is decreasing impatience (DI), meaning that levels of impatience decrease over time. …”
  20. 100