Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
w decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
5 nn » 5 non (Expand Search), 59 nn (Expand Search), 5 nm (Expand Search)
5 w » 5 wt (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
w decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
5 nn » 5 non (Expand Search), 59 nn (Expand Search), 5 nm (Expand Search)
5 w » 5 wt (Expand Search)
-
81
Data_Sheet_5_Chemical Similarity of Co-occurring Trees Decreases With Precipitation and Temperature in North American Forests.CSV
Published 2021“…Variation in metabolite richness among communities was positively correlated with species richness, but variation in mean chemical similarity was not. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that plant metabolomes play a more important role in community assembly in wetter and warmer climates, even at temperate latitudes, and suggest that metabolomic traits can provide unique insight to studies of trait-based community assembly.…”
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
The mean and standard deviation of parameters.
Published 2024“…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. …”
-
87
Top view of the experimental setup.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
88
Parameters of energy harvesting.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
89
Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
90
Graph for maximum Frequency at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
91
Graph for maximum Power at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
92
Summary of experimentation results.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
93
Piezoelectric eel.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
-
98
-
99
Good things come to those who wait—Decreasing impatience for health gains and losses
Published 2020“…<div><p>Historically, time preferences are modelled by assuming constant discounting, which implies a constant level of impatience. The prevailing empirical finding, however, is decreasing impatience (DI), meaning that levels of impatience decrease over time. …”
-
100