Search alternatives:
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 non » _ non (Expand Search), a non (Expand Search), e non (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 non » _ non (Expand Search), a non (Expand Search), e non (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
The decrease or inhibition of Hsp90 induced REST degradation.
Published 2019“…<p>(A) Effect of Hsp90α ASO on cell viability. Differentiated SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with different concentrations of Hsp90α ASO. …”
-
3
DCD is strikingly decreased in HS lesions.
Published 2019“…Co-staining was performed with K77 (green), which is a marker of eccrine sweat glands. Scale bar is 100μm. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Decreased MBP levels in the brain in <i>Large</i><sup><i>myd/myd</i></sup> mice.
Published 2020“…The panels on the right are magnified images of the corpus callosum indicated by the squares in the panels on the left (Scale bars: 100 μm). Decreased immunoreactivity of MBP was observed in <i>Large</i><sup><i>myd/myd</i></sup> mice. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size.
Published 2022“…Data pooled from N = 9 simulations, each corresponding to behavioral data from a different mouse. (B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…(d) Noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PV cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 31 neurons, mean ± SE). Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 49.6, <i>p</i> = 2.6 × 10<sup>−12</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 1.94, <i>p</i> = 0.02, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), F = 56.5, <i>p</i> = 8.8 × 10<sup>−14</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 3.5, <i>p</i> = 3.5 × 10<sup>−05</sup>). …”
-
20