Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 point » _ point (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 point » _ point (Expand Search)
-
201
-
202
-
203
-
204
-
205
-
206
Inflammation is not sufficient to account for decreased relative bacterial numbers in higher dose infection.
Published 2012“…Groups were comprised of 5 mice with Mean and SEM plotted for each group. …”
-
207
-
208
-
209
-
210
-
211
Disruption of bacterial K<sup>+</sup> homeostasis decreases Mtb colonization of macrophages.
Published 2019“…Each point on the graph represents a bacterium or a tight cluster of bacteria (black circles—WT, red squares– Δ<i>ceoBC</i>, blue triangles—<i>ceoBC</i>*). p-values were obtained with a Mann-Whitney statistical test. …”
-
212
The 2lox Lsd1 variant shows decreased binding to known interactors.
Published 2013“…For the two single point mutants, the M448V mutation has a more profound effect on CoREST binding. *: immunoglobulin heavy chain. …”
-
213
Deletion of STX1B decreases the size of RRP in glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses.
Published 2014“…<p>(A) Average EPSC evoked by application of 0.5 M hypertonic sucrose solution for 15 s in WT and STX1B<sup>−/−</sup> neurons (left). …”
-
214
Treatment with anti-JAM-C antibody decreases the severity of antigen-induced arthritis
Published 2011“…Results shown represent the mean ± SEM for anti-JAM-C antibody-treated (= 5 on day 4, = 6 on day 8, black columns) and isotype-matched control antibody-treated (= 5 at both time points, open columns) mice. …”
-
215
-
216
-
217
-
218
-
219
Density plots of normalised consumer final power (PC) for the six example networks, shown over decreasing ratios of mean consumer to mean resource potential, .
Published 2020“…<p>Each plot shows the density for the normalised consumer final power at = 0.75, 0.5, and 0.25, from left to right, as the ratio decreases due to increased resource flow during the simulation. …”
-
220