Search alternatives:
points decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), point increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 points » 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search), _ point (Expand Search)
points decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), point increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 points » 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search), _ point (Expand Search)
-
81
-
82
-
83
-
84
Flow diagram of the study.
Published 2023“…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
85
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2023“…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
86
-
87
-
88
-
89
-
90
-
91
Multivariable Linear Regression Model of the Residents P-V Fit score<sup>a</sup>.
Published 2025Subjects: -
92
-
93
Magnetic field setups in zero field (a) and vertically alternating field (b).
Published 2022Subjects: -
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
-
98
-
99
-
100
mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents.
Published 2019“…(<b>E</b>) The inhibitory effect of CHPG on GlyR-IPSCs was not blocked by intracellularly loaded GDP-β-S (62.3 ± 6.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[6] = 2.782, <i>p</i> = 0.032), chelerythrine (60.9 ± 11.3% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[6] = 2.705, <i>p</i> = 0.035), or Ro-32-0432 (69.9 ± 3.2% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 8.495, <i>p</i> < 0.001). (<b>F</b>) Postsynaptic loading of U-0126 or PD98059 prevented CHPG from decreasing glycinergic responses (U-0126, 107.6 ± 10.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[8] = 0.997, <i>p</i> = 0.348; PD98059, 93.1 ± 5.0% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.883, <i>p</i> = 0.418). …”