Search alternatives:
points decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 points » 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search), 3 points (Expand Search)
points decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 points » 5 point (Expand Search), _ points (Expand Search), 3 points (Expand Search)
-
1601
-
1602
-
1603
-
1604
-
1605
-
1606
-
1607
-
1608
-
1609
-
1610
-
1611
-
1612
Decreased reactive gliosis following ES delivered 5d post-demyelination.
Published 2014“…Contralateral intact control nerves displayed only minimal GFAP IF (A). However 5d post-lysophosphatidyl choline (LPC)/FG injection there was a marked increase in GFAP IF (B). …”
-
1613
Spatial structure of precipitation anomaly trend (left column) and trend difference relating to changes in precipitation intensity distribution (right column) from ((a), (e)) GPCP,...
Published 2013“…</strong> Spatial structure of precipitation anomaly trend (left column) and trend difference relating to changes in precipitation intensity distribution (right column) from ((a), (e)) GPCP, ((b), (f)) AMIP5, ((c), (g)) CMIP historical and ((d), (h)) RCP 4.5 data sets. …”
-
1614
-
1615
-
1616
-
1617
-
1618
-
1619
-
1620
Decreased HATL5 expression in esophageal and cervical carcinomas.
Published 2014“…Staining intensities were determined as described in Material and Methods. (<b>A</b>) In esophageal squamous cell carcinomas, a highly significant decrease in staining intensity (P<0.0001) was observed between normal tissues and each of the two groups of cancer tissues; grades I-II and grade III, respectively. …”