Search alternatives:
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
121
Data Sheet 1_Elevated relative humidity significantly decreases cannabinoid concentrations while delaying flowering development in Cannabis sativa L..docx
Published 2025“…Furthermore, high RH significantly suppressed cannabinoid accumulation: cannabidiolic acid (CBD-A), cannabidiol (CBD), and cannabichromenic acid (CBC-A) levels decreased by approximately 4.9-fold, 3.2-fold, and 13-fold, respectively. …”
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
Talin concentration at muscle attachment sites increases 5-fold during attachment maturation.
Published 2019“…Note that the concentration increases about 2-fold from 20 h to 24 h APF and 5-fold to 30 h APF. …”
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
Neural responses to corner-folds depend on corner angle.
Published 2019“…<b>(B)</b> Spike rate difference for each of the fold responses. As in (A), the average spike rate difference decreases with increasing fold angle. …”
-
135
-
136
-
137
-
138
-
139
-
140
Evaluating the Potential of Ozone Microbubbles for Inactivation of Tulane Virus, a Human Norovirus Surrogate
Published 2024“…After 2, 10, and 20 min postgeneration, the ozone concentration of microbubbles naturally decreased from 4 ppm to 3.2 ± 0.2, 2.26 ± 0.19, and 1.49 ± 0.23 ppm and resulted in 1.43 ± 0.44, 0.88 ± 0.5, and 0.68 ± 0.53 log<sub>10</sub> viral reductions, respectively, while the ozone concentration of aqueous ozone decreased from 4 ppm to 2.52 ± 0.07, 0.43 ± 0.05, and 0.09 ± 0.01 ppm and produced 0.8 ± 0.28, 0.29 ± 0.41, and 0.16 ± 0.21 log<sub>10</sub> reductions against Tulane virus, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.0526), suggesting that structuring of ozone in the bubbles over the applied treatment conditions did not have a significant effect, though future study with continuous generation of ozone microbubbles is needed.…”