Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
281
-
282
-
283
Possible Points of Canonical Wnt Inhibition.
Published 2015“…<p>This study has highlighted six possible points of canonical Wnt inhibition occurring in HSCs. (1) Predominantly non-canonical ligand expression. …”
-
284
-
285
OCA alone markedly decreases and combined with Gemcitabine or Cisplatin abrogates growth of iCCA xenografts.
Published 2019“…After 4 weeks, when the tumor size was approximately 100 mm<sup>3</sup> (T<sub>0</sub>) mice were treated with OCA (0.03% w/w, 30 mg/kg) alone or combined with Cisplatin (2.4 mg/Kg in 100 μl) or Gemcitabine (1.05 mg/Kg in 100 μl) for 5 additional weeks. a) Results are expressed as percent increase in tumor volume at different time points. …”
-
286
-
287
-
288
-
289
-
290
-
291
-
292
Validation of primary screen hits reveals compounds that recapitulate increased spheroid size (swell) or decreased MUC5AC in the lumen.
Published 2023“…Compounds that appeared to cause toxicity were identified by observing a significant decrease in spheroid counts in the swell readout or a significant decrease in the total nuclear intensity of the MUC5AC ratio readout. …”
-
293
-
294
-
295
Evaluating the Potential of Ozone Microbubbles for Inactivation of Tulane Virus, a Human Norovirus Surrogate
Published 2024“…After 2, 10, and 20 min postgeneration, the ozone concentration of microbubbles naturally decreased from 4 ppm to 3.2 ± 0.2, 2.26 ± 0.19, and 1.49 ± 0.23 ppm and resulted in 1.43 ± 0.44, 0.88 ± 0.5, and 0.68 ± 0.53 log<sub>10</sub> viral reductions, respectively, while the ozone concentration of aqueous ozone decreased from 4 ppm to 2.52 ± 0.07, 0.43 ± 0.05, and 0.09 ± 0.01 ppm and produced 0.8 ± 0.28, 0.29 ± 0.41, and 0.16 ± 0.21 log<sub>10</sub> reductions against Tulane virus, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.0526), suggesting that structuring of ozone in the bubbles over the applied treatment conditions did not have a significant effect, though future study with continuous generation of ozone microbubbles is needed.…”
-
296
-
297
-
298
-
299
-
300