Showing 241 - 260 results of 28,926 for search '(( 5 step decrease ) OR ( 50 ((((ng decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 0.96s Refine Results
  1. 241
  2. 242

    Tannic acid blocks an early step of HCV entry. by Shuanghu Liu (307907)

    Published 2015
    “…Huh7.5 cells were inoculated with HCV JFH1-AM120-Rluc at a MOI of 10 for one hour at 4°C in presence of 50 μM of tannic acid, 500 μg/ml of heparin or no inhibitor as a control. …”
  3. 243
  4. 244

    Estimated time (in days) required for a decrease of the viral titer by 1 log<sub>10</sub> TCID<sub>50</sub>/mL. by Camille Lebarbenchon (122050)

    Published 2011
    “…<p>Estimated time (in days) required for a decrease of the viral titer by 1 log<sub>10</sub> TCID<sub>50</sub>/mL.…”
  5. 245

    OP50 <i>E. coli</i>-fed nematodes are generally healthy while pathogen-fed worms demonstrate a decrease in overall health. by Michelle R. Bond (669241)

    Published 2014
    “…(B) The average pumping rate for nematodes fed <i>P. aeruginosa</i> is decreased when compared to N2 animals fed OP50. Worms with a <i>pmk-1(km25)</i> background exhibit the largest decrease in pumping rate. …”
  6. 246
  7. 247
  8. 248

    The schematic diagram of the SD decrease and CNR increase rates by 50% ASiR and MBIR (compared with those by FBP). by Peigang Ning (541890)

    Published 2014
    “…<p>As the mA value decreased, MBIR brought about gradually augmented variations in the two parameters, whereas 50% ASiR did not give rise to noticeable variations.…”
  9. 249

    Changes in V<sub>T</sub> and FRC during decreasing PEEP. by Marcus J. Kitchen (444759)

    Published 2014
    “…<p>The increase in tidal volume (V<sub>T</sub>) and decrease in functional residual capacity (FRC) when positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is decreased in 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O stepwise decrements (10-5-0PEEP), large steps (10-0PEEP) and from a small step (5-0PEEP) in the ventilated lung. …”
  10. 250
  11. 251
  12. 252

    Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area [33]. by Katie Frerker (680803)

    Published 2014
    “…</p><p>Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115843#pone.0115843-Wiegmann1" target="_blank">[33]</a>.…”
  13. 253
  14. 254
  15. 255
  16. 256
  17. 257
  18. 258
  19. 259
  20. 260