Notch1 deletion in the corneal epithelium leads to progressive barrier impairment. by Asadolah Movahedan (434957)

“…<p>Notch1 knockout efficiency was evaluated by western blotting of pooled corneal epithelial sheets (N=8 per group) from conditional Notch1^-/- mice showing 64% to 70% decrease in Notch 1 expression comparing to epithelial sheets from WT littermates (A). …”

Rate of hydrolysis of MTX-CONH-(CH₂)₆-NH₂ from PEG₄₀-CONH-(CH₂)₅-CONH-(CH₂)₆-NHCO-MTX at aci... by Itzik Cooper (2873291)

“…<p>Rate of hydrolysis was determined by the decrease in the absorbance of the PEG₄₀-MTX conjugate at 305nm as a function of time during dialysis against 1mM HCl (pH 3.0) or 50 mM Hepes buffer (pH 7.4). …”

The difference in outcome parameters between groups. by Mi-yeon Yu (813778)

“…<p>Outcome parameters represent the followings; O1, decrease of time-averaged proteinuria from trial phase and to the observational phase; O2, remission of UPCR <0.2 g/g cr during observational phase; O3, rapid decline of eGFR ≥5 mL/min/1.73 m² during observational phase; O4, composite outcome of increase in serum cr level (≥50% from baseline) noted during observational phase or deterioration of renal function to end stage renal disease. …”

Tattooed and Non-Tattooed Women: Motivation, Social Practices and Risk Behavior by Adriano Schlösser (10468759)

“…The sample presented more similarities than differences between tattooed and non-tattooed groups, suggesting that growing popularization and social acceptance of tattooing has led to a decrease of the differences between the groups. …”

Quantification of Cre recombinase efficiency. by Rosa-Eva Huettl (113537)

“…Quantification (J) shows a 2-fold decrease in the numbers of <i>Npn-1</i> expressing sensory neurons (positive for Isl-1) in mutant embryos to 10.4%±0.8% at brachial and 13.5%±0.4% at lumbar levels (<i>n</i> = 3, <i>p</i>^brachial<0.005; <i>p</i>^lumbar<0.0005). …”

Table_1_Sodium-Related Adaptations to Drought: New Insights From the Xerophyte Plant Zygophyllum xanthoxylum.DOCX by Jie-Jun Xi (5989541)

“…The results of this study demonstrate that Z. xanthoxylum has evolved a notable ability to utilize Na⁺ ions to lower Ψ_s, swell its leaves, and decrease stomatal aperture sizes, in order to enable the additional uptake and storage of water and mitigate losses. …”

EZH2 Is Associated with Malignant Behavior in Pancreatic IPMN via p27^Kip1 Downregulation by Hideyuki Kuroki (607412)

“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Fifty-four surgically resected pancreatic IPMN specimens, including a total of 181 lesions (normal duct in 48, adenoma in 50, borderline atypia in 53, carcinoma in situ (CIS) in 19, and invasive carcinoma in 11) were analyzed by immunohistochemical staining (EZH2, Ki-67, p27^Kip1). …”

Image_4_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_3_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Table_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.pdf by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_7_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_2_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_3_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_6_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_2_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Video_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WMV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Distribution of Small RNA-Generating Loci from Each Chromosome by Kristin D Kasschau (2735)

“…<div><p>(A) Scrolling-window analysis (50,000-nt window and 10,000-nt scroll) of small RNA loci. …”

Inhibition of EGFR-Grb2 interaction by the small tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG1478. by Peter Lanzerstorfer (540769)

“…(B) Time course of the Grb2 contrast change upon EGF stimulation in control and AG1478 pretreated (1, 10 μM) cells (n = 50). Pretreatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor leads to a decreased contrast compared to untreated cells. …”