Data_Sheet_1_A five domains assessment of sow welfare in a novel free farrowing system.zip by Kate Plush (19369684)

“…MR 0.5 ± 0.29 events, p = 0.038, and back leg forward: FC 227 ± 50.7 vs. MR 127 ± 26.4 events, p = 0.019), and a decreased proportion of MR sows had facial injuries after farrowing (10% CI [5, 20] vs. 67% CI [47, 95], p < 0.001). …”

Data_Sheet_1_A five domains assessment of sow welfare in a novel free farrowing system.zip by Kate Plush (19369684)

“…MR 0.5 ± 0.29 events, p = 0.038, and back leg forward: FC 227 ± 50.7 vs. MR 127 ± 26.4 events, p = 0.019), and a decreased proportion of MR sows had facial injuries after farrowing (10% CI [5, 20] vs. 67% CI [47, 95], p < 0.001). …”

Knowledge and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine. by Adaobi Uchenna Mosanya (20384248)

“…The modal age range was 18–24 years accounting for 814 (71.2%) of the participants. A total of 577 (50.5%) participants demonstrated a good level of knowledge while 685 (59.9%) showed a positive perception of the COVID-19 vaccine. …”

Logistics regression COVID-19 vaccine predictors. by Adaobi Uchenna Mosanya (20384248)

“…The modal age range was 18–24 years accounting for 814 (71.2%) of the participants. A total of 577 (50.5%) participants demonstrated a good level of knowledge while 685 (59.9%) showed a positive perception of the COVID-19 vaccine. …”

Perception towards COVID-19 vaccine. by Adaobi Uchenna Mosanya (20384248)

“…The modal age range was 18–24 years accounting for 814 (71.2%) of the participants. A total of 577 (50.5%) participants demonstrated a good level of knowledge while 685 (59.9%) showed a positive perception of the COVID-19 vaccine. …”

The level of knowledge of the COVID-19 vaccine. by Adaobi Uchenna Mosanya (20384248)

“…The modal age range was 18–24 years accounting for 814 (71.2%) of the participants. A total of 577 (50.5%) participants demonstrated a good level of knowledge while 685 (59.9%) showed a positive perception of the COVID-19 vaccine. …”

S1 Data - by Ghada R. Sallam (18319994)

“…However, the increase in density led to a significant decrease in the accumulation of heavy metals in both water and fish organs. …”

PmrAB-dependent lipid A modification. by Michael Knopp (3814009)

“…The top 50 proteins with the most significant change in abundance (lowest p-value) in the <i>pmrA</i> mutant are shown. …”

Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

Radiation exposure and thyroid cancer: a review by Maria Laura Iglesias (6118628)

“…The risk increases after exposure to a mean dose of more than 0.05-0.1 Gy (50-100mGy). …”

Alternans produced in human but not in porcine model. Intracellular Ca²⁺ transient [Ca]_i and membrane voltage (V_m) response at various pacing frequ... by Namit Gaur (11054096)

“…<p>(A) Relative [Ca]_i of isolated right ventricular (RV) myocytes is shown versus time as the pacing cycle length progressively decreased in steps. The full pacing protocol is shown in the upper left graph. …”

Main testing instruments for the experiment. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

Simulation major data. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

Numerical conditions. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

Airflow coefficients. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

<i>g</i> and <i>K</i>_<i>c</i> at different return air outlet heights. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

<i>K</i>_<i>c</i> at ACH = 35/h. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”