Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
w decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
2 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search)
5 w » 5 wt (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
w decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
2 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search)
5 w » 5 wt (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Knockdown of ATP2C1 results in a minor decrease of [Ca<sup>2+</sup>] in WPB.
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…<p>(a) Left: noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PPys cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 285 neurons, mean ± SE). Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Table of step height.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
20
The well wall step.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”