Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
w decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a step » _ step (Expand Search)
5 w » 5 wt (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
w decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a step » _ step (Expand Search)
5 w » 5 wt (Expand Search)
-
41
EIS impedance of (a) Gadolinium-doped ceria and (b) Lanthanum strontium cobalt oxide.
Published 2025Subjects: -
42
DC conductivity of (a) Gadolinium-doped ceria and (b) Lanthanum strontium cobalt oxide.
Published 2025Subjects: -
43
XRD pattern of (a) Gadolinium-doped ceria and (b) Lanthanum strontium cobalt oxide.
Published 2025Subjects: -
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
Juvenile demyelination leads to a substantial decrease in potassium currents in PV interneurons of the PFC.
Published 2025“…<p><b>A.</b> Representative traces of potassium currents evoked with 10 mV potential steps from −70mV to +60 mV in PFC PV interneurons from control (black) and cuprizone (red) mice. …”
-
59
-
60
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…(d) Noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PV cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 31 neurons, mean ± SE). Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 49.6, <i>p</i> = 2.6 × 10<sup>−12</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 1.94, <i>p</i> = 0.02, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), F = 56.5, <i>p</i> = 8.8 × 10<sup>−14</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 3.5, <i>p</i> = 3.5 × 10<sup>−05</sup>). …”