Showing 21 - 40 results of 20,067 for search '(( 5 w decrease ) OR ( 50 ((ns decrease) OR (((a decrease) OR (mean decrease)))) ))', query time: 0.60s Refine Results
  1. 21
  2. 22
  3. 23
  4. 24
  5. 25
  6. 26

    Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM. by Zhenxing Liu (399809)

    Published 2019
    “…Downregulation of DOM decreased PER levels at CT1-5 and CT17-21. (Scale bar: 50 um.) …”
  7. 27
  8. 28

    Mechlorethamine gel causes epithelium thinning, epithelium-stroma separation, and decreased total stroma cell count. by Ana M. Sandoval-Castellanos (11611315)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>A) Epithelium thickness decreased, and B) the percentage of epithelium-stroma separation increased after NM exposure. …”
  9. 29
  10. 30
  11. 31
  12. 32
  13. 33
  14. 34
  15. 35

    GCase activity is significantly decreased in the brain and liver of the homozygous <i>GBA1</i> D409V KI mouse model at 4, 8, and 12 months of age. by Nicole K. Polinski (10947787)

    Published 2021
    “…In whole brain homogenate (A,C) and liver homogenate (B,D), GCase activity is significantly decreased in the <i>GBA1</i> D409V KI homozygous (HOM) mice as compared to C57Bl/6 wild type (WT) mice (n = 7/group). …”
  16. 36

    FTY720 treatment decreased tumor growth in a xenograft model of hepatoblastoma. by Laura L. Stafman (6577184)

    Published 2019
    “…The mean ± SEM for each treatment group were calculated and depicted in a bar graph. …”
  17. 37
  18. 38

    Decreased clonogenic capacity of U87MG and U251MG glioma cells dependent on SHG-44 concentration. by Denis Mustafov (19137870)

    Published 2025
    “…<b>(B)</b> A significant decrease in the proliferative clonal capacity of U251MG colonies was observed with 50ΜM and 100ΜM SHG-44 treatment. …”
  19. 39
  20. 40

    Decreased phosphorylation of EIF2α underlies the impairment of arsenite-induced SG formation in LSM12-depleted cells. by Jongbo Lee (9914603)

    Published 2020
    “…Relative levels of EIF2α phosphorylation were calculated by normalizing the ratio of phospho-EIF2α to EIF2α protein levels per condition to that in control cells with no chemical treatment. Data represent means ± SEM (<i>n</i> = 3). n.s., not significant; *<i>P</i> < 0.05, **<i>P</i> < 0.01, as determined by Student <i>t</i> test. …”