Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
Insufficient disulfide bond formation results in a decrease in alkaline phosphatase activity and accumulation of the reduced form of DegP in LCFA-utilizing cells.
Published 2020“…The band corresponding to AP is shown (Mol. wt. ~50 kDa). <i>(C) Compromised DsbA-DsbB machinery is responsible for the decrease in alkaline phosphatase activity in cells utilizing oleate</i>. …”
-
112
Solvent Entrapment of BI 763963 by Solid Solution Formation
Published 2025“…Two binary T-w phase diagrams were constructed showing the outline of the solidus and liquidus, where EtOH and IPA are present in the solid phase of BI 763963 at 0.54 and 1.5 wt %, respectively, at equilibrium. Importantly, the solvent solubility of BI 763963 was found to be dependent on the residual solvent level in the solid phase and in the case of EtOH increased by almost 50% at just 1.1 wt % EtOH entrapment. …”
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
Table of step height.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
117
The well wall step.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
118
-
119
-
120