Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search), i wt (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search), i wt (Expand Search)
-
13561
-
13562
-
13563
Individual data and box plots on ∑TEQs of all samples.
Published 2024“…<p>Individual data show decreasing temporal trends that depend on study area until 2010 (A). …”
-
13564
-
13565
Temporal trend (1972–2017) of ∑PCB (upper graph) and PCB TEQ (lower graph) in osprey eggs in the whole dataset and in different study areas.
Published 2024“…Both ∑PCB and PCB TEQ decreased significantly in the whole dataset (annual decrease 3.5 and 4.0%, respectively) and in all study areas (annual decrease 2.2–4.4%).…”
-
13566
Individual data and box plots on ∑PCB and PCB TEQs of all samples.
Published 2024“…<p>In left panel ∑PCB (A) and PCB TEQ (C) show decreasing temporal trends that depend on study area until 2010. …”
-
13567
Individual data and box plots on ∑PCDD/F and PCDD/F-TEQs of all samples.
Published 2024“…<p>In left panel ∑PCDD/F (A) and PCDD/F TEQ (C) show decreasing trends since 1980’s-1990’s until 2010. …”
-
13568
Fig 12 -
Published 2024“…<p>Geometric means of absolute concentrations (A) and average relative (B) concentrations of 5 most abundant BDE congeners and the sum of other congeners in different study areas during the first (1972–1986), second (1987–2001) and third (2002–2017) trimester of the study. …”
-
13569
-
13570
-
13571
-
13572
-
13573
-
13574
-
13575
Effects of Solid Precipitation and Surface Corrosion on the Adhesion Strengths of Sintered Hydrate Deposits on Pipe Walls
Published 2020“…It was found that the hydrate adhesion strengths increased by 1.2–1.5× when the soaking time of the carbon steel substrate in a 5 wt % NaCl solution increased from 24 to 72 h, which reduced the water wetting angle from 112 ± 3.5° to 94 ± 3.3°. …”
-
13576
Effects of Solid Precipitation and Surface Corrosion on the Adhesion Strengths of Sintered Hydrate Deposits on Pipe Walls
Published 2020“…It was found that the hydrate adhesion strengths increased by 1.2–1.5× when the soaking time of the carbon steel substrate in a 5 wt % NaCl solution increased from 24 to 72 h, which reduced the water wetting angle from 112 ± 3.5° to 94 ± 3.3°. …”
-
13577
Effects of Solid Precipitation and Surface Corrosion on the Adhesion Strengths of Sintered Hydrate Deposits on Pipe Walls
Published 2020“…It was found that the hydrate adhesion strengths increased by 1.2–1.5× when the soaking time of the carbon steel substrate in a 5 wt % NaCl solution increased from 24 to 72 h, which reduced the water wetting angle from 112 ± 3.5° to 94 ± 3.3°. …”
-
13578
Effects of Solid Precipitation and Surface Corrosion on the Adhesion Strengths of Sintered Hydrate Deposits on Pipe Walls
Published 2020“…It was found that the hydrate adhesion strengths increased by 1.2–1.5× when the soaking time of the carbon steel substrate in a 5 wt % NaCl solution increased from 24 to 72 h, which reduced the water wetting angle from 112 ± 3.5° to 94 ± 3.3°. …”
-
13579
-
13580