Showing 1,661 - 1,680 results of 99,639 for search '(( 5 wt decrease ) OR ( 5 ((((wt decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.40s Refine Results
  1. 1661
  2. 1662
  3. 1663
  4. 1664
  5. 1665
  6. 1666
  7. 1667
  8. 1668
  9. 1669

    Localisation and quantification of NL2 immunoreactivity within the hippocampus of WT and dystrophin-deficient mice, reacted and imaged under identical conditions. by Elżbieta Krasowska (635317)

    Published 2014
    “…<p>(A 1) shows the stereotypical pattern of NL2 immunoreactivity within the CA1 region of tissue from WT animals. …”
  10. 1670
  11. 1671
  12. 1672
  13. 1673
  14. 1674
  15. 1675
  16. 1676
  17. 1677

    Occupancy of PRC1 and PRC2 at Rest peaks in <i>Wt</i> and <i>Rest</i>−/− mES cells. by Nikolaj Dietrich (181521)

    Published 2012
    “…P-values were calculated by comparing the number of Rest binding sites with 1.5 fold increase or decrease to those expected from a population with similar distribution as the matched control using chi<sup>2</sup>-tests (C) ChIP-seq profiles for the positions marked 1 to 6 in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002494#pgen-1002494-g004" target="_blank">Figure 4B</a> as examples. …”
  18. 1678

    Levels of P-Smad1/5 correlate with the strength of NCPC phenotype in <i>smad5</i> morphant embryos. by Jennifer A. Schumacher (339492)

    Published 2013
    “…Injection of a low dose of <i>smad5</i> MOs (3 ng) leads to WT, “<i>snh</i>” and “<i>sbn</i>” phenotypes, whereas injection of higher doses of <i>smad5</i> MOs (5 ng, 6 ng) lead to “<i>sbn</i>” and “<i>swr</i>” phenotypes. …”
  19. 1679

    Reduced TBP recruitment in SWI/SNF and RSC mutants is frequently associated with increased +1 nucleosome occupancies in promoters of genes with 5’ Gcn4 binding sites. by Yashpal Rawal (606804)

    Published 2022
    “…<p><b>(A)</b> (i)-(ii) Averaged TBP occupancies surrounding Gcn4 5’ motifs from ChIP-seq data of sonicated chromatin from at least 2 biological replicates of the indicated strains, with labels along the plots are arranged in decreasing order of summit heights. …”
  20. 1680