Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search), i wt (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search), i wt (Expand Search)
-
15281
-
15282
-
15283
-
15284
Cobalt-Catalyzed C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Enabled by Well-Defined Precatalysts with L,X-Type Ligands
Published 2022“…The protocol enabled efficient C–C bond formation with a host of nucleophiles and electrophiles (36 examples, 34–95%) with precatalyst loadings of 5 mol %. …”
-
15285
Cobalt-Catalyzed C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Enabled by Well-Defined Precatalysts with L,X-Type Ligands
Published 2022“…The protocol enabled efficient C–C bond formation with a host of nucleophiles and electrophiles (36 examples, 34–95%) with precatalyst loadings of 5 mol %. …”
-
15286
Cobalt-Catalyzed C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Enabled by Well-Defined Precatalysts with L,X-Type Ligands
Published 2022“…The protocol enabled efficient C–C bond formation with a host of nucleophiles and electrophiles (36 examples, 34–95%) with precatalyst loadings of 5 mol %. …”
-
15287
Cobalt-Catalyzed C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Enabled by Well-Defined Precatalysts with L,X-Type Ligands
Published 2022“…The protocol enabled efficient C–C bond formation with a host of nucleophiles and electrophiles (36 examples, 34–95%) with precatalyst loadings of 5 mol %. …”
-
15288
Cobalt-Catalyzed C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–C(sp<sup>3</sup>) Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling Enabled by Well-Defined Precatalysts with L,X-Type Ligands
Published 2022“…The protocol enabled efficient C–C bond formation with a host of nucleophiles and electrophiles (36 examples, 34–95%) with precatalyst loadings of 5 mol %. …”
-
15289
-
15290
-
15291
Integrin αVβ5 antibody inhibits the uptake of ROS by piPSC-RPE cells.
Published 2015“…Addition of an inhibitory anti-integrin αVβ5 antibody significantly decreased phagocytosis by approximately 50% in piPSC-RPE cells. …”
-
15292
-
15293
-
15294
Simultaneously inhibition <i>Nlu-miR-34</i> and <i>NlInR2</i> in SW strain induced the decrease of SW BPHs.
Published 2019“…<p>(A) Antagomir-34 (with two different quantities) and ds<i>NlInR2</i> (0.84 ng) were injected into the third instar SW strain nymphs, showed that injection of antagomir-34 decreased the ratio of SW type BPH (Chi-square test, 40ng: χ<sup>2</sup> = 5.8, df = 1, <i>p</i> = 0.003; 60ng: χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.9, df = 1, <i>p</i> = 0.042). …”
-
15295
-
15296
-
15297
-
15298
-
15299
-
15300
Table_5_SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses before and after a third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in Italian healthcare workers aged ≤60 years: One year of surveillance.xlsx
Published 2022“…The cohorts were monitored from the 12th day after the first vaccine dose up to 1 month after the third vaccine dose for a total of eight time points and about 1 year of surveillance (T1 = 12 days after the first dose; T2 = 10 days after the second dose; T3 = 1 month after the second dose; T4 = 3 months after the second dose; T5 = 4 months after the second dose; T6 = 5 months after the second dose; T7 = 7 months after the second dose; T8 = 1 month after the third dose for Group 1; T8* = 9 months after the second dose for Group 2; T9 = 1 month after the third dose for Group 2). …”