Table_9_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_4_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Image 3_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff by Peiqin Shi (22130170)

“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”

Image 2_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff by Peiqin Shi (22130170)

“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”

Image 1_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff by Peiqin Shi (22130170)

“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”

S1 Data - by Renjie Wang (1986553)

“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”

S3 Data - by Renjie Wang (1986553)

“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”

S2 Data - by Renjie Wang (1986553)

“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”

S5 Data - by Renjie Wang (1986553)

“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”

S6 Data - by Renjie Wang (1986553)

“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”

S4 Data - by Renjie Wang (1986553)

“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”

S7 Data - by Renjie Wang (1986553)

“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”

Factors affecting LLINs usage at household level. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Not owning a bed decreased the likelihood of net usage by 13.3% [aOR=0.867 (95% CI = 0.816–0.920), p < 0.001]. …”

Net usage across intervention arms. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Not owning a bed decreased the likelihood of net usage by 13.3% [aOR=0.867 (95% CI = 0.816–0.920), p < 0.001]. …”

Factors associated with malaria infection. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Not owning a bed decreased the likelihood of net usage by 13.3% [aOR=0.867 (95% CI = 0.816–0.920), p < 0.001]. …”

Risk of bias assessment of included studies. by Imane Salmam (21485704)

“…Notably, all studies assessing the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) reported reduced distances, consistently falling below the 50^th percentile of normative values. …”

VO_2peak results. by Imane Salmam (21485704)

“…Notably, all studies assessing the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) reported reduced distances, consistently falling below the 50^th percentile of normative values. …”

Thermal load of main components during parking. by Weijian Li (762796)

“…<p>During the radiation increasing, the relationship between the solar radiation and the components temperature follows as: atmosphere, <i>T</i>_<i>atm</i> = 0.006086<i>I</i>^1.117 + 25.95; cabin air, <i>T</i>_<i>ca</i> = 0.006086<i>I</i>^1.117 + 25.95; the steering wheel, <i>T</i>_<i>Sw</i> = 0.1161<i>I</i>^0.9124 + 20.69; front seat, <i>T</i>_<i>s</i>1 = 2.475<i>I</i>⁴ + 0.3333<i>I</i>³−9.094<i>I</i>² + 10.64<i>I</i> + 50.25; rear seat, <i>T</i>_<i>s</i>2 = −0.1648<i>I</i>² + 10.35<i>I</i> + 40.8; During the radiation decreasing, the correlation follows as: atmosphere ; steering wheel <i>T</i>_<i>Sw</i> = 1.739<i>I</i>^0.4881 + 33.89; front seat <i>T</i>_<i>s</i>1 = −1.886<i>I</i>⁴ + 0.8018<i>I</i>³ + 4.752<i>I</i>² + 6.391<i>I</i> + 53.98; rear seat <i>T</i>_<i>s</i>2 = −0.8943<i>I</i>⁴ + 1.891<i>I</i>³ + 1.865<i>I</i>² + 1.704<i>I</i> + 51.24. …”

Esophageal Lengthening in Paraesophageal Hernia Repair by Sadia Tasnim (8729219)

“…However, its major advantage is that there is no resection of the stomach and decreased risk of a redundant neoesophagus.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Reference(s)</b></p><p dir="ltr">Horvath, Karen D. …”

Total Robotic Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis by Jett, G. Kimble (5419655)

“…J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006;16:518-21.</p><p dir="ltr">5. Luison F, Boyd WD. …”