Search alternatives:
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
n decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
50 n » 50 ns (Expand Search), 50 ng (Expand Search), 50 μ (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
n decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
50 n » 50 ns (Expand Search), 50 ng (Expand Search), 50 μ (Expand Search)
-
16761
Table_4_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
16762
Image 3_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff
Published 2025“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”
-
16763
Image 2_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff
Published 2025“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”
-
16764
Image 1_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff
Published 2025“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”
-
16765
S1 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
16766
S3 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
16767
S2 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
16768
S5 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
16769
S6 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
16770
S4 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
16771
S7 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
16772
Factors affecting LLINs usage at household level.
Published 2025“…Not owning a bed decreased the likelihood of net usage by 13.3% [aOR=0.867 (95% CI = 0.816–0.920), p < 0.001]. …”
-
16773
Net usage across intervention arms.
Published 2025“…Not owning a bed decreased the likelihood of net usage by 13.3% [aOR=0.867 (95% CI = 0.816–0.920), p < 0.001]. …”
-
16774
Factors associated with malaria infection.
Published 2025“…Not owning a bed decreased the likelihood of net usage by 13.3% [aOR=0.867 (95% CI = 0.816–0.920), p < 0.001]. …”
-
16775
Synthesis of Bis-β-Diketonate Lanthanide Complexes with an Azobenzene Bridge and Studies of Their Reversible Photo/Thermal Isomerization Properties
Published 2019“…The ligand, bis-β-diketone with an azobenzene bridge (4,4′-(4,4,4-trifluoro-1,3-butanedione)azobenzene, <b>H</b><sub><b>2</b></sub><b>L</b>), was prepared for the synthesis of a series of dinuclear lanthanide complexes with the formula <b>[Ln</b><sub><b>2</b></sub><b>L</b><sub><b>3</b></sub><b>(DMSO)</b><sub><b>4</b></sub><b>]</b> (Ln = Eu<sup>3+</sup>, Gd<sup>3+</sup>, Tb<sup>3+</sup>, and DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide). …”
-
16776
Synthesis of Bis-β-Diketonate Lanthanide Complexes with an Azobenzene Bridge and Studies of Their Reversible Photo/Thermal Isomerization Properties
Published 2019“…The ligand, bis-β-diketone with an azobenzene bridge (4,4′-(4,4,4-trifluoro-1,3-butanedione)azobenzene, <b>H</b><sub><b>2</b></sub><b>L</b>), was prepared for the synthesis of a series of dinuclear lanthanide complexes with the formula <b>[Ln</b><sub><b>2</b></sub><b>L</b><sub><b>3</b></sub><b>(DMSO)</b><sub><b>4</b></sub><b>]</b> (Ln = Eu<sup>3+</sup>, Gd<sup>3+</sup>, Tb<sup>3+</sup>, and DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide). …”
-
16777
Risk of bias assessment of included studies.
Published 2025“…Notably, all studies assessing the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) reported reduced distances, consistently falling below the 50<sup>th</sup> percentile of normative values. …”
-
16778
Synthesis of Bis-β-Diketonate Lanthanide Complexes with an Azobenzene Bridge and Studies of Their Reversible Photo/Thermal Isomerization Properties
Published 2019“…The ligand, bis-β-diketone with an azobenzene bridge (4,4′-(4,4,4-trifluoro-1,3-butanedione)azobenzene, <b>H</b><sub><b>2</b></sub><b>L</b>), was prepared for the synthesis of a series of dinuclear lanthanide complexes with the formula <b>[Ln</b><sub><b>2</b></sub><b>L</b><sub><b>3</b></sub><b>(DMSO)</b><sub><b>4</b></sub><b>]</b> (Ln = Eu<sup>3+</sup>, Gd<sup>3+</sup>, Tb<sup>3+</sup>, and DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide). …”
-
16779
VO<sub>2peak</sub> results.
Published 2025“…Notably, all studies assessing the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) reported reduced distances, consistently falling below the 50<sup>th</sup> percentile of normative values. …”
-
16780
Thermal load of main components during parking.
Published 2022“…<p>During the radiation increasing, the relationship between the solar radiation and the components temperature follows as: atmosphere, <i>T</i><sub><i>atm</i></sub> = 0.006086<i>I</i><sup>1.117</sup> + 25.95; cabin air, <i>T</i><sub><i>ca</i></sub> = 0.006086<i>I</i><sup>1.117</sup> + 25.95; the steering wheel, <i>T</i><sub><i>Sw</i></sub> = 0.1161<i>I</i><sup>0.9124</sup> + 20.69; front seat, <i>T</i><sub><i>s</i>1</sub> = 2.475<i>I</i><sup>4</sup> + 0.3333<i>I</i><sup>3</sup>−9.094<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> + 10.64<i>I</i> + 50.25; rear seat, <i>T</i><sub><i>s</i>2</sub> = −0.1648<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> + 10.35<i>I</i> + 40.8; During the radiation decreasing, the correlation follows as: atmosphere ; steering wheel <i>T</i><sub><i>Sw</i></sub> = 1.739<i>I</i><sup>0.4881</sup> + 33.89; front seat <i>T</i><sub><i>s</i>1</sub> = −1.886<i>I</i><sup>4</sup> + 0.8018<i>I</i><sup>3</sup> + 4.752<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> + 6.391<i>I</i> + 53.98; rear seat <i>T</i><sub><i>s</i>2</sub> = −0.8943<i>I</i><sup>4</sup> + 1.891<i>I</i><sup>3</sup> + 1.865<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> + 1.704<i>I</i> + 51.24. …”