Search alternatives:
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
cm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 cm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 c (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
cm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 cm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 c (Expand Search)
-
18261
Table_11_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
18262
Table_15_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
18263
Loss of MLL1 in adult mice.
Published 2021“…<p>(A) Giemsa-stained sections from the femur of <i>Mll1</i><sup><i>FC/+; RC/+</i></sup> and <i>Mll1</i><sup><i>FC/FC; RC/+</i></sup> mice. …”
-
18264
Table_5_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
18265
Data_Sheet_1_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.PDF
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
18266
Table_9_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
18267
Table_4_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX
Published 2024“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
-
18268
Image 3_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff
Published 2025“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”
-
18269
Image 2_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff
Published 2025“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”
-
18270
Image 1_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff
Published 2025“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”
-
18271
S1 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
18272
S3 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
18273
S2 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
18274
S5 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
18275
S6 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
18276
S4 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
18277
S7 Data -
Published 2025“…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
-
18278
Factors affecting LLINs usage at household level.
Published 2025“…Not owning a bed decreased the likelihood of net usage by 13.3% [aOR=0.867 (95% CI = 0.816–0.920), p < 0.001]. …”
-
18279
Net usage across intervention arms.
Published 2025“…Not owning a bed decreased the likelihood of net usage by 13.3% [aOR=0.867 (95% CI = 0.816–0.920), p < 0.001]. …”
-
18280
Factors associated with malaria infection.
Published 2025“…Not owning a bed decreased the likelihood of net usage by 13.3% [aOR=0.867 (95% CI = 0.816–0.920), p < 0.001]. …”