Developmental potential of mouse SCC transferred oocytes in vitro. by Xiaoyu Liao (8161995)

A proposed model illustrates the dynamic and profound interaction of host polyamine biosynthesis and eIF5A hypusination with KSHV infection. by Guillaume N. Fiches (9300348)

“…At the early stage of lytic switch, KSHV ORF50/RTA gene starts to be actively transcribed upon certain stimuli, and the constant high level of hypusine-eIF5A ensures the efficient translation of RTA protein and overall promotes KSHV lytic reactivation. …”

Cooperative Effects of FOXL2 with the Members of TGF-β Superfamily on FSH Receptor mRNA Expression and Granulosa Cell Proliferation from Hen Prehierarchical Follicles by Ning Qin (418292)

“…In contrast, a significant decrease of <i>FSHR</i> mRNA was detected after treatment with follistatin (50 ng/ml) and resulted in an inhibitory effect on the cell proliferation. …”

Anti-interleukin-1 treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes (TRACK): A multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial by Piero Ruscitti (3684799)

“…Participants in the TNFi group had a nonsignificant slight decrease of HbA1c%. Assuming the success threshold to be HbA1c% ≤ 7, we considered an absolute risk reduction (ARR) = 0.42 (experimental event rate = 0.54, control event rate = 0.12); thus, we estimated, rounding up, a number needed to treat (NNT) = 3. …”

Expression of transcription factor, fast-twitch fiber, and slow-twitch fiber genes following acute or chronic stimulation. by Michael A. Petrie (677819)

“…MYH6 (6.76±2.50, p = 0.030), MYH7 (11.69±4.93, p = 0.025), MYL2 (2.78±0.80, p = 0.063), and MYL3 (9.07±3.75, p = 0.046) were increased after >1 year of muscle training, while they were decreased 3 hours after single session of muscle stimulation (0.81±0.04, p = 0.0073, 0.77±0.073, p = 0.030, 0.92±0.036, p = 0.066, 0.76±0.078, p = 0.037; respectively) (I, J, K, and L). † indicates a p-value <0.05 for a within group paired t-test. ‡ indicates a p-value <0.10 for a within group paired t-test.…”

Data_Sheet_1_A five domains assessment of sow welfare in a novel free farrowing system.zip by Kate Plush (19369684)

“…MR 0.5 ± 0.29 events, p = 0.038, and back leg forward: FC 227 ± 50.7 vs. MR 127 ± 26.4 events, p = 0.019), and a decreased proportion of MR sows had facial injuries after farrowing (10% CI [5, 20] vs. 67% CI [47, 95], p < 0.001). …”

Data_Sheet_1_A five domains assessment of sow welfare in a novel free farrowing system.zip by Kate Plush (19369684)

“…MR 0.5 ± 0.29 events, p = 0.038, and back leg forward: FC 227 ± 50.7 vs. MR 127 ± 26.4 events, p = 0.019), and a decreased proportion of MR sows had facial injuries after farrowing (10% CI [5, 20] vs. 67% CI [47, 95], p < 0.001). …”

Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

MtDNA carryover removal and SCC integraty by MRR manipulation in mouse oocytes. by Xiaoyu Liao (8161995)

Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

Minidysferlin do not improve muscle histology. A by William Lostal (162211)

“…<b>D</b>/Quantification of CNF in muscles of <i>Dysf ^prmd</i> mice that expressed an equivalent level of minidysferlin than dysferlin in normal muscle and 6 times this dose. No decrease in the number of CNF was seen with the dose giving a level of minidysferlin equivalent to the dysferlin expression (x=1) whereas an important increase in seen with the dose leading to a 6-fold increase of expression (x=6). …”

PmrAB-dependent lipid A modification. by Michael Knopp (3814009)

“…The top 50 proteins with the most significant change in abundance (lowest p-value) in the <i>pmrA</i> mutant are shown. …”

Main testing instruments for the experiment. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

Simulation major data. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

Numerical conditions. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

Airflow coefficients. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

<i>g</i> and <i>K</i>_<i>c</i> at different return air outlet heights. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

<i>K</i>_<i>c</i> at ACH = 35/h. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”