Image4_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”

Image1_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”

Image6_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”

Image5_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”

Image2_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”

Survival probability and perceptual history. by Guido Gigante (50145)

Fasting/Refeeding Cycles Prevent Myocardial Dysfunction and Morphology Damage in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats by Matheus Fécchio Pinotti (5669387)

“…The level of significance considered was 5% (a = 0.05). Results: The RF rats presented lower cardiac atrophy than R50 in relation to C rats. …”

Fasting/Refeeding Cycles Prevent Myocardial Dysfunction and Morphology Damage in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats by Matheus Fécchio Pinotti (5669387)

“…The level of significance considered was 5% (a = 0.05). Results: The RF rats presented lower cardiac atrophy than R50 in relation to C rats. …”

Task design. by Hamish Innes-Brown (191821)

GS/GOGAT cycle. by Alejandro Torres-Sánchez (713429)

Data_Sheet_2_Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of buspirone in healthy and depression-like state juvenile salmon.docx by Sheyda Shapouri (17946893)

Cell Growth on (“Janus”) Density Gradients of Bifunctional Zeolite L Crystals by Nermin Seda Kehr (1420342)

Table_2.DOCX by Yu Han (251741)

Table_3.DOCX by Yu Han (251741)

<i>Koji</i> glycosylceramide commonly contained in Japanese traditional fermented foods alters cholesterol metabolism in obese mice by Hiroshi Hamajima (6164933)

Data_Sheet_1_Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of buspirone in healthy and depression-like state juvenile salmon.xlsx by Sheyda Shapouri (17946893)

Table_1.DOCX by Yu Han (251741)

Table_4.DOCX by Yu Han (251741)

Cell Growth on (“Janus”) Density Gradients of Bifunctional Zeolite L Crystals by Nermin Seda Kehr (1420342)

Effects of mutations in highly conserved motif on OsCERK activity and function. by Fang-Cheng Bi (226018)

“…Note that the three variant proteins showed decreased activity, with the C461A variant showing the least activity. …”