Showing 861 - 880 results of 34,683 for search '(( 50 ((((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 5 point decrease ))', query time: 0.67s Refine Results
  1. 861
  2. 862
  3. 863
  4. 864
  5. 865
  6. 866
  7. 867
  8. 868

    Fig 9 - by Dennis Ochola (11626912)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
  9. 869

    Fig 7 - by Dennis Ochola (11626912)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
  10. 870

    Fig 4 - by Dennis Ochola (11626912)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
  11. 871

    Fig 5 - by Dennis Ochola (11626912)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
  12. 872
  13. 873
  14. 874

    Estimated time (in days) required for a decrease of the viral titer by 1 log<sub>10</sub> TCID<sub>50</sub>/mL. by Camille Lebarbenchon (122050)

    Published 2011
    “…<p>Estimated time (in days) required for a decrease of the viral titer by 1 log<sub>10</sub> TCID<sub>50</sub>/mL.…”
  15. 875

    OP50 <i>E. coli</i>-fed nematodes are generally healthy while pathogen-fed worms demonstrate a decrease in overall health. by Michelle R. Bond (669241)

    Published 2014
    “…(B) The average pumping rate for nematodes fed <i>P. aeruginosa</i> is decreased when compared to N2 animals fed OP50. Worms with a <i>pmk-1(km25)</i> background exhibit the largest decrease in pumping rate. …”
  16. 876
  17. 877

    The schematic diagram of the SD decrease and CNR increase rates by 50% ASiR and MBIR (compared with those by FBP). by Peigang Ning (541890)

    Published 2014
    “…<p>As the mA value decreased, MBIR brought about gradually augmented variations in the two parameters, whereas 50% ASiR did not give rise to noticeable variations.…”
  18. 878
  19. 879

    K-means++ clustering algorithm. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

    Published 2025
    “…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”
  20. 880

    Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area [33]. by Katie Frerker (680803)

    Published 2014
    “…</p><p>Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115843#pone.0115843-Wiegmann1" target="_blank">[33]</a>.…”