Search alternatives:
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
17921
-
17922
-
17923
-
17924
-
17925
Superhydrophobic/Superhydrophilic Janus Evaporator for Extreme High Salt-Resistance Solar Desalination by an Integrated 3D Printing Method
Published 2023“…The emerging solar desalination technology has incomparable advantages for providing a clean water solution. However, the issue of salt accumulation on the solar evaporator tops during the steam generation leads to a considerable decrease in the evaporation rate. …”
-
17926
Superhydrophobic/Superhydrophilic Janus Evaporator for Extreme High Salt-Resistance Solar Desalination by an Integrated 3D Printing Method
Published 2023“…The emerging solar desalination technology has incomparable advantages for providing a clean water solution. However, the issue of salt accumulation on the solar evaporator tops during the steam generation leads to a considerable decrease in the evaporation rate. …”
-
17927
-
17928
-
17929
-
17930
-
17931
Table1_Integrated transcriptomics and proteomics assay identifies the role of FCGR1A in maintaining sperm fertilization capacity during semen cryopreservation in sheep.XLSX
Published 2023“…The results showed that both the sperm viability (fresh group: 87.65% ± 4.17% vs. 75.8% ± 1.15%, cryopreserved group: 48.15% ± 0.63% vs. 42.45% ± 2.61%, p < 0.05) and motility (fresh group: 83.27% ± 4.15% vs. 70.41% ± 1.07%, cryopreserved group: 45.31% ± 3.28% vs. 35.13% ± 2.82%, p < 0.05) were significantly reduced in fresh and frozen sperm when FCGR1A was blocked. Moreover, the cleavage rate of embryos fertilized by FCGR1A-blocked sperm was noted to be significantly lower in both fresh (95.28% ± 1.16% vs. 90.44% ± 1.56%, p < 0.05) and frozen groups (89.8% ± 1.50% vs. 82.53% ± 1.53%, p < 0.05). …”
-
17932
-
17933
-
17934
-
17935
-
17936
-
17937
-
17938
-
17939
-
17940