Showing 121 - 140 results of 41,438 for search '(( 50 ((((ns decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( a point decrease ))', query time: 0.78s Refine Results
  1. 121
  2. 122

    PowerPoint Slides for: Urinary Periostin Excretion Predicts Renal Outcome in IgA Nephropathy by Hwang J.H. (3300987)

    Published 2016
    “…Histologically, group 3 patients were correlated with severe interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (p = 0.004), interstitial inflammation (p = 0.007), hyaline arteriolosclerosis (p = 0.001) and glomerular sclerosis (p < 0.001). A higher initial uPOSTN/Cr level was associated with a greater decline in eGFR during follow-up (p = 0.043 when initial eGFR ≥60; p = 0.025 when eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2), and the renal outcomes with end-stage renal disease (ESRD; p = 0.003), ESRD and/or eGFR decrease of >30% (p = 0.033) and ESRD and/or eGFR decrease of >50% (p = 0.046) occurred significantly more in group 3. …”
  3. 123
  4. 124
  5. 125
  6. 126
  7. 127
  8. 128
  9. 129
  10. 130

    mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents. by Zi-Yang Zhang (4988555)

    Published 2019
    “…(<b>F</b>) Postsynaptic loading of U-0126 or PD98059 prevented CHPG from decreasing glycinergic responses (U-0126, 107.6 ± 10.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[8] = 0.997, <i>p</i> = 0.348; PD98059, 93.1 ± 5.0% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.883, <i>p</i> = 0.418). …”
  11. 131
  12. 132

    Melting points of HNL1 (A & B) and <i>Hb</i>HNL (C & D). by Bryan J. Jones (7354394)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>Melting points were measured by decreases in fluorescence intensity (A & C) and by decreases in fluorescence lifetime (B & D). …”
  13. 133
  14. 134
  15. 135
  16. 136

    S3 File - by Andrei Rajkovic (10965915)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
  17. 137
  18. 138

    Estimates of the survival function (a) and kernel estimate of the hazard function (b) with points of greatest decrease. by Iveta Selingerová (849472)

    Published 2016
    “…<p>Estimates of the survival function (a) and kernel estimate of the hazard function (b) with points of greatest decrease.…”
  19. 139
  20. 140