Search alternatives:
026 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
026 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
16601
File S1 - Impaired Functionality of Antiviral T Cells in G-CSF Mobilized Stem Cell Donors: Implications for the Selection of CTL Donor
Published 2013“…After 48 h of storage at 4°C, a mean of 93% (mCMV_pp65_A02, n = 4) and 96% (mCMV_pp65_B07, n = 5) of the frequency in the fresh sample (baseline) was obtained. …”
-
16602
Sequential broadside application of 100 µM FCCP at two separate regions in the same FDB fibre.
Published 2014“…Red vertical calibration bar in <b>A</b> represents 50 µm.</p>…”
-
16603
HG module schematic.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16604
Label data volume and label distribution.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16605
The structure of the context guided block.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16606
SEnet module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16607
AC-LayeringNetV2 architecture module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16608
Cracks included in the dataset.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16609
Loss function comparison plot.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16610
Edge device performance benchmarking.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16611
Typical error cases.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16612
Computational efficiency comparison.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16613
-
16614
Backbone comparison in crack detection.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16615
Statistical analysis table for ablation tests.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16616
Summary of false positives and false negatives.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16617
PR parameter comparison chart.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16618
RAK-Conv.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16619
Structure of YOLOv8n.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
16620