Showing 161 - 180 results of 20,713 for search '(( 50 ((a decrease) OR (((teer decrease) OR (nn decrease)))) ) OR ( a fold decrease ))', query time: 0.56s Refine Results
  1. 161

    Combination of DNA Damage, Autophagy, and ERK Inhibition: Novel Evodiamine-Inspired Multi-Action Pt(IV) Prodrugs with High-Efficiency and Low-Toxicity Antitumor Activity by Xiao-Meng Liu (778197)

    Published 2023
    “…Among them, compound <b>10</b> exhibited a 118-fold enhancement in the IC<sub>50</sub> value compared to cisplatin and low toxicity to normal cells. …”
  2. 162

    Combination of DNA Damage, Autophagy, and ERK Inhibition: Novel Evodiamine-Inspired Multi-Action Pt(IV) Prodrugs with High-Efficiency and Low-Toxicity Antitumor Activity by Xiao-Meng Liu (778197)

    Published 2023
    “…Among them, compound <b>10</b> exhibited a 118-fold enhancement in the IC<sub>50</sub> value compared to cisplatin and low toxicity to normal cells. …”
  3. 163

    Combination of DNA Damage, Autophagy, and ERK Inhibition: Novel Evodiamine-Inspired Multi-Action Pt(IV) Prodrugs with High-Efficiency and Low-Toxicity Antitumor Activity by Xiao-Meng Liu (778197)

    Published 2023
    “…Among them, compound <b>10</b> exhibited a 118-fold enhancement in the IC<sub>50</sub> value compared to cisplatin and low toxicity to normal cells. …”
  4. 164

    Combination of DNA Damage, Autophagy, and ERK Inhibition: Novel Evodiamine-Inspired Multi-Action Pt(IV) Prodrugs with High-Efficiency and Low-Toxicity Antitumor Activity by Xiao-Meng Liu (778197)

    Published 2023
    “…Among them, compound <b>10</b> exhibited a 118-fold enhancement in the IC<sub>50</sub> value compared to cisplatin and low toxicity to normal cells. …”
  5. 165
  6. 166
  7. 167
  8. 168
  9. 169
  10. 170
  11. 171
  12. 172
  13. 173
  14. 174
  15. 175
  16. 176
  17. 177
  18. 178
  19. 179
  20. 180

    Predicting pattern diversity decreases as a function of and . by Selim Haj Ali (21222613)

    Published 2025
    “…(a) and (b): Average negative predictive value for and , respectively for and . …”