AOX inhibitor supresses growth of <i>T</i>. <i>hominis</i> cells inside the RK13 host cells at early meront stages of the infection, and affects the ability to infect by the spores... by Kacper M. Sendra (14285356)

“…<p>Effects of the two clinically used anti-microsporidian drugs (albendazole, 350 nM; and fumagillin, 200 nM), and an inhibitor of the AOX Colletochlorin B (CCB, 50 μM) on progression of the parasite life cycle were tested in a synchronised time course of infection in <i>T</i>. …”

³¹P NMR spectra of Myo-pHis. by Mehul V. Makwana (13570466)

“…From left to right: pHis antibody (ab231709); pTyr antibody (pY20; pSer antibody (Q5); pThr antibody (Q4). For each blot, the gel has four lanes, with decreasing amounts of protein: 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 mg. …”

Table_1_Durability of immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with chronic liver disease.docx by Ruixin Song (15399459)

“…Within 30 days of booster immunization, the positive rates of nCoV NTAb and nCoV S-RBD in patients with CLD rapidly increased from 29.0% and 48.4% at the end of basic immunization to 95.2% and 90.5%, and maintained a high level (defined as the positive rate >50%) until 120 days when the positive rates of nCoV NTAb and nCoV S-RBD were still high at 79.5% and 87.2%, respectively. …”

Table_3_Durability of immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with chronic liver disease.docx by Ruixin Song (15399459)

“…Within 30 days of booster immunization, the positive rates of nCoV NTAb and nCoV S-RBD in patients with CLD rapidly increased from 29.0% and 48.4% at the end of basic immunization to 95.2% and 90.5%, and maintained a high level (defined as the positive rate >50%) until 120 days when the positive rates of nCoV NTAb and nCoV S-RBD were still high at 79.5% and 87.2%, respectively. …”

Table_1_Practical Model to Optimize the Strategy of Adjuvant Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in T1-2N1 Breast Cancer With Modern Systemic Therapy.docx by Fei-Fei Xu (538090)

“…After a median follow-up of 69 months, the 5-year rate of DFS, BCSS, and LRR in the overall cohort was 90.2%, 97.4%, and 3.6%, respectively. …”

Table_2_Durability of immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with chronic liver disease.docx by Ruixin Song (15399459)

“…Within 30 days of booster immunization, the positive rates of nCoV NTAb and nCoV S-RBD in patients with CLD rapidly increased from 29.0% and 48.4% at the end of basic immunization to 95.2% and 90.5%, and maintained a high level (defined as the positive rate >50%) until 120 days when the positive rates of nCoV NTAb and nCoV S-RBD were still high at 79.5% and 87.2%, respectively. …”

Targeting pan-caspase activation suppresses HIV-1 infection. by Jason Segura (14608801)

“…Primary CD8-depleted PBMC were infected with HIV-1_BAL for 6 days in the presence of 50uM indicated caspase inhibitors and analyzed for the accumulation of p24+/CD62L- populations (<b>A</b>) as well as the level of infection using intracellular p24 staining (<b>B</b>). …”

Image_1_T-Lymphocyte Subsets Alteration, Infection and Renal Outcome in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.TIF by Jiachuan Xiong (748476)

“…The primary outcomes were the major infection and renal outcome.</p><p>Results: A total of 410 CKD patients were enrolled; the average age was 47.25 years. …”

Data_Sheet_1_T-Lymphocyte Subsets Alteration, Infection and Renal Outcome in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.docx by Jiachuan Xiong (748476)

“…The primary outcomes were the major infection and renal outcome.</p><p>Results: A total of 410 CKD patients were enrolled; the average age was 47.25 years. …”

Image_2_T-Lymphocyte Subsets Alteration, Infection and Renal Outcome in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.TIFF by Jiachuan Xiong (748476)

“…The primary outcomes were the major infection and renal outcome.</p><p>Results: A total of 410 CKD patients were enrolled; the average age was 47.25 years. …”

Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis of wood-aluminium-based sorbents: Comparison with conventional preparation and evaluation of chromium removal by Nena Velinov (13216155)

“…The synthesis reaction time decreases about 5 folds using ultrasonic energy compared to the conventional method without sonication. …”

Table_8_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_1_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_6_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_10_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_2_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_7_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_13_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_12_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_14_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”