Showing 1 - 20 results of 40,595 for search '(( 50 ((a decrease) OR (_ decrease)) ) OR ((( 10 mm decrease ) OR ( _ em decrease ))))*', query time: 0.86s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Likelihood of a decrease in runoff (a), an increase in runoff (b) and a severe change in ecosystems (c) for selected Δ<em>T</em><sub>g</sub> levels by Dieter Gerten (557088)

    Published 2013
    “…</strong> Likelihood of a decrease in runoff (a), an increase in runoff (b) and a severe change in ecosystems (c) for selected Δ<em>T</em><sub>g</sub> levels. …”
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Predictive values of IC<sub>50</sub> in mM (FFAs) for vanadium compounds and <i>in vivo</i> observations IC<sub>50</sub> in mM (FFAs) and decreasing blood glucose level. by Elena V. Fedorova (603922)

    Published 2014
    “…<p>Predictive values of IC<sub>50</sub> in mM (FFAs) for vanadium compounds and <i>in vivo</i> observations IC<sub>50</sub> in mM (FFAs) and decreasing blood glucose level.…”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

    The SNP (rs2230500) in <em>PRKCH</em> Decreases the Risk of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in a Chinese Young Adult Population by Lijun Wu (152858)

    Published 2012
    “…</p> <h3>Conclusions/Significance</h3><p>Our data provide evidence that the SNP (rs2230500) in <em>PRKCH</em> decreases the risk of CIMT that is a worthwhile predictor of stroke and complement system possibly mediates this process.…”
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Unique Biofilm Signature, Drug Susceptibility and Decreased Virulence in <em>Drosophila</em> through the <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> Two-Component System PprAB by Sophie de Bentzmann (116508)

    Published 2012
    “…Here we decipher the regulon of the <em>P. aeruginosa</em> response regulator PprB of the TCS PprAB. …”
  19. 19

    2-CDA decreases PIN 1 protein levels in 7WD10 cells. by Crystal D. Hayes (304487)

    Published 2013
    “…(B) ImageJ quantitation revealed significantly decreased PIN 1 protein levels at 0.1 mM (39%, p<0.001), at 0.5 µM (30%, p<0.001), 1.0 µM (24%, p<0.001), 5.0 µM (19%, p<0.001) and 10.0 µM (29%, p<0.001) compared to untreated control cells n = 4 in each group. *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, vs. untreated controls.…”
  20. 20