Showing 1,341 - 1,360 results of 34,925 for search '(( 50 ((a decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ) OR ( e ((fold decrease) OR (point decrease)) ))', query time: 1.08s Refine Results
  1. 1341
  2. 1342
  3. 1343
  4. 1344
  5. 1345
  6. 1346
  7. 1347

    Stability scores with refinement, no USM decreases, no W. by Jedediah M. Singer (10331212)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Effects of guided and random substitutions within GM designs with a maximum sequence identity to any expert-designed protein of less than 50%, when guided substitutions are not permitted to decrease USM EC<sub>50</sub> predictions and neither guided nor random substitutions are allowed to change amino acids to tryptophan.…”
  8. 1348
  9. 1349

    Stability scores with refinement, no USM decreases, no AFILMVWY. by Jedediah M. Singer (10331212)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Effects of guided and random substitutions within GM designs with a maximum sequence identity to any expert-designed protein of less than 50%, when guided substitutions are not permitted to decrease USM EC<sub>50</sub> predictions and neither guided nor random substitutions are allowed to change amino acids to alanine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, valine, tryptophan, or tyrosine.…”
  10. 1350
  11. 1351
  12. 1352
  13. 1353
  14. 1354
  15. 1355
  16. 1356

    S1 File - by Chantelle M. de Vet (16535257)

    Published 2024
    “…The student’s RV-GLS consistency was poor during the first 25 measurements, moderate-to good during the second 25 measurements and again poor-to-moderate during the final 50 measurements. Repeated measurements analysis showed a significant decrease in variability of the LV- and RV-GLS score differences between the expert and trainees over time (<i>p</i><sub>adj</sub><0.001), which was not significantly different between trainees. …”
  17. 1357
  18. 1358
  19. 1359
  20. 1360

    GLS analysis with 2D-STE software. by Chantelle M. de Vet (16535257)

    Published 2024
    “…The student’s RV-GLS consistency was poor during the first 25 measurements, moderate-to good during the second 25 measurements and again poor-to-moderate during the final 50 measurements. Repeated measurements analysis showed a significant decrease in variability of the LV- and RV-GLS score differences between the expert and trainees over time (<i>p</i><sub>adj</sub><0.001), which was not significantly different between trainees. …”