Search alternatives:
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 nm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 cm (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 nm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 cm (Expand Search)
-
101
Rescue of <i>MBNL</i>1 e5 and <i>MBNL</i>2 e5 and e8 mis-splicing by erythromycin lactobionate treatment at 10 DPI.
Published 2022“…Note the decreased inclusion of <i>MBNL</i>1 e5 (+e5) and <i>MBNL</i>2 e5 (+e5) in DM1 hiNeurons treated with 35 or 65 μM erythromycin for 48 h relative to placebo treated cells. …”
-
102
-
103
-
104
Klf5 expression is down-regulated in the ruptured human and experimental AAA.
Published 2020Subjects: -
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
Simulated effects of increased pCREB combined with decreased pCaMKIIα on bistability.
Published 2022“…<p>(A1) Modification of model. Increased basal phosphorylation of CREB <i>k</i><sub><i>basalp_creb</i></sub>, concurrent with decreased basal phosphorylation of CaMKIIα <i>k</i><sub><i>basalp_CaMKII</i></sub>, in the absence of the effects of MeCP2/HDAC2/Sin3a (red) ([<i>E</i><sub><i>comp</i></sub>] = 0; [<i>E</i><sub><i>MeCP2</i></sub>] = 0). …”
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
-
118
Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.
Published 2023“…<p>Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.</p>…”
-
119
-
120
GLS analysis with 2D-STE software.
Published 2024“…The student’s RV-GLS consistency was poor during the first 25 measurements, moderate-to good during the second 25 measurements and again poor-to-moderate during the final 50 measurements. Repeated measurements analysis showed a significant decrease in variability of the LV- and RV-GLS score differences between the expert and trainees over time (<i>p</i><sub>adj</sub><0.001), which was not significantly different between trainees. …”