Showing 37,861 - 37,880 results of 38,399 for search '(( 50 ((a decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( e ((non decrease) OR (point decrease)) ))', query time: 1.00s Refine Results
  1. 37861

    Supplemental Material for Juurakko et al., 2021 by Collin L. Juurakko (10941459)

    Published 2021
    “…</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>A list of protein accession identifications for all significantly increased and decreased proteins obtained by MS were assembled and used as inputs for STRING (version 11.0) to predict protein-protein interactions (Franceschini <i>et al.…”
  2. 37862

    SLE progression is accompanied by highly specific blockade of cytokine-induced STAT signaling and target gene induction. by Matthew B. Hale (260700)

    Published 2009
    “…<p>(A) Detailed analysis of 24 signaling nodes. Data points are averaged from three mice; error bars represent standard deviation. …”
  3. 37863

    Mean response rate indicating the velocity of illusory movement, Run 1 and Run 2 combined data (N = 12). by Tatjana Seizova-Cajic (80195)

    Published 2013
    “…The velocity computed this way steadily decreases throughout the vibration period. <i>Triangles</i>: Means were computed only for periods in which movement was perceived (i.e., zeros were excluded) separately for illusory extension (positive sign) and flexion (negative sign). …”
  4. 37864

    Epileptiform activity induces opposite changes in the RRP and P<sub>rel.</sub> by Carlo Natale Giuseppe Giachello (380180)

    Published 2013
    “…<p>(A,B) Cumulative curves of EPSP amplitudes evoked at 10 Hz at different time-points. The linear part was fitted as described in Methods. …”
  5. 37865

    Perfusion of substance P (15 μM) had no effect on the amplitude or slope of the fEPSP recorded from the CA1 region of the rat hippocampal slice by Kerrie N Wease (12951)

    Published 2011
    “…(b) and (c) Pooled time course data showing the lack of effect of substance P on the slope (b) and amplitude (c) of the fEPSP. Points represent mean ± s.e.m., n = 4. Scale bar represents 0.5 mV and 10 ms.…”
  6. 37866

    Transcriptional response of components of the Cu efflux network and phenotypic consequences of their deletion. by W. Lee Pang (102290)

    Published 2013
    “…Expression of the metalloregulator <i>VNG1179C</i> does not change, suggesting that it is post-transcriptionally activated. Error bars are s.e.m for n = 5. Points (X) within each expression profile were normalized to the expression value at t = 0 (X<sub>0</sub>). …”
  7. 37867

    PTEN expression in mitochondrial and cytosolic fraction after the excitotoxic stimulus. by Valentina Grande (647515)

    Published 2014
    “…Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M., *<i>P</i><0.05, #<i>P</i><0.05, **<i>P</i><0.01 with Two way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test. …”
  8. 37868
  9. 37869

    The effect of ranibizumab and aflibercept injected intraperitoneally into neonatal mice. by Yusuke Ichiyama (11237783)

    Published 2022
    “…(F-I) The high magnification images of the whole-mounted retinas show decreased number of branching points, increased area of regressed capillaries (filled arrowheads), and decreased number of proliferating ECs (open arrowheads) in the aflibercept group but not in the ranibizumab groups. …”
  10. 37870

    G-chart of Diagnosis Dates of Cancer. by Harald Schrem (578639)

    Published 2016
    “…Cases marked by the letter “B” and a red dot on the lower control limit (LCL) indicate a failed Benneyan test pointing to statistically relevant increases in the diagnostic event rate which should trigger clinical concerns in regard to causation, e.g. by intensified or uncontrolled immunosuppression. …”
  11. 37871
  12. 37872

    Robotic-Assisted Median Arcuate Ligament Release With Celiac Artery Lysis and Celiac Ganglion Neurolysis by G. Kimble Jett (6509428)

    Published 2020
    “…<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.078"><em>J Vasc Surg</em>. 2009;50:124-133.…”
  13. 37873

    Table_8_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  14. 37874

    Table_1_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  15. 37875

    Table_6_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  16. 37876

    Table_10_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  17. 37877

    Table_2_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  18. 37878

    P4HA3 deficiency increased sensitization to immune checkpoint inhibitors and P4HA3 could predict the clinical therapeutic effect of PD-1 inhibitor (Camrelizumab). by Hong Yan Huang (20135965)

    Published 2024
    “…(B) P4HA3 deficiency inhibited proliferation ability of MDA-MB-231, HCT116 and A549 cell lines by EdU assay. Scale bar: 50 μm. …”
  19. 37879

    Table_7_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  20. 37880

    Table_13_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”