Difference in <i>CV</i>² between the FCM and microscopy measurements shows FCM measurements contain substantial shot noise. by Luca Galbusera (9510071)

“…<p><i>Top</i>: Difference between the <i>CV</i>² as measured by the FCM and the microscopy setup for different transcriptional reporters of <i>E. coli</i> promoters (colored points). Both axes are shown on a logarithmic scale. …”

Immunoblot analysis of CdbS-FLAG accumulation under different stress conditions. by Michael Seidel (715355)

“…<p><b>A.</b> CdbS-FLAG accumulation decreases during development. …”

Image_1_MCC950 Ameliorates Acute Liver Injury Through Modulating Macrophage Polarization and Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Function.JPEG by Wei Yan (4327)

“…In conclusion, MCC950 pretreatment alleviates CCl₄-induced ALI through enhanced M2 macrophage and MDSC function at different time points of ALI. Further understanding of MCC950 in ALI may be a new potential therapeutic strategy.…”

Visualization of individual metabolite concentration ratios. by Rønnaug Solberg (252034)

“…Metabolites are given on the y axis (i.e., row), animal profiles are given on the x axis (i.e., columns) and each “pixel” represents a metabolite change (in log basis 2 scale) between two consecutive time points. …”

Strength-duration properties of the ulnar nerve. by Hsing-Jung Lai (821293)

“…The lines are linear regression fits to the data points. In sensory axons, the SDTC is significantly decreased in carriers (0.46±0.03 ms for carriers v.s. 0.55±0.02 ms for NC1, <i>p</i> = 0.03), but no significant difference between patients (0.49±0.05 ms) and NC2 (0.51±0.02 ms, <i>p</i> = 0.39). …”

Bump speed irregularity due to connectivity noise at high drive. by Raymond Wang (7527374)

“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Bump speed as a function of bump position with connectivity noise of magnitude 0.002 and drive <i>b</i> = 1.5. …”

Longitudinal study of breathing after shRNA injections in three mouse cohorts. by Maria Cristina D. Picardo (6388190)

“…Best-fit lines and the 95% confidence intervals are shown. The number of points in the left column (Trpm4) decreases as animals died of respiratory failure starting at the bin for days 25–30. …”

Experimental protocol and analysis procedure. by Mareike Röther (606661)

“…<p>(A) During rapid pH-cycling from pH 7.5 to 5.5 extracellular the fluorescence increases or decreases due to extracellular pH-change. …”

Sampling design. by Kiwako S. Araki (680112)

“…Black dots represent the sampling points. In (b), numbers represent genets, which are numbered in decreasing order of the number of ramets they contained. …”

Expression of osteogenic marker genes during osteogenic differentiation of MSC. by Sandra Mjoll Jonsdottir-Buch (432782)

“…Expression of <i>RUNX2</i> decreased from day 7 to day 21 for all cultures (C–D), still expression of <i>RUNX2</i> in cultures originating from HPLO treated MSC was higher at both time-points compared to FBS and also at day 21 for HPLF compared to FBS (p≤0.05). * = p≤0.05, ** = p≤0.01.…”

Network changes in phase-locking. by Scott Marek (841529)

“…<p>(A) Age-related decreases in phase-locking tended to be within and between association networks (e.g., DM, FP, and SAL), while within- and between-network oscillations involving processing networks remained relatively stable. …”

Time-Response EEG activity of SR9009 during the light phase. by Ariadna Amador (2560231)

“…Mice were dosed with SR9009 at different time points (ZT3, ZT6, and ZT9) on separate days in order to generate a Time-Response Curve. …”

Expression of c-Myc and Akt induces stem cell marker expression in primary p53^−/− astrocytes. by Josefine Radke (281457)

“…<p>Control cultures (p53Crtl) showed no stem cell marker expression (A I–A IV) and strong GFAP-IR (A V). All oncogene-transduced astrocyte cultures showed a significantly decreased GFAP-IR in early passages (2^nd) (B V, D V, F V) and complete loss of GFAP-IR in late (12^th) passages (C V, E V, G V) and induced expression of nestin (B II–G II). …”

Network fragmentation and diffusion reverse the variance induced by mitochondrial networks. by Robert C. Glastad (10692277)

“…The three rows show decreasing levels of network heterogeneity, expressed via different seed numbers (more seed points give a more homogeneous network). …”

Regulation of receptor expression by T5-1 and T5-12 in two cell types. by Donghwa Kim (252081)

“…At the later time points T5-1 decreased TAS2R5 expression while T5-12 increased expression in both cell types. …”

XRN2 depletion leads to an accumulation of tRF-1s, in-tRFs, and tRF-leaders in Ago2. by Briana Wilson (8460459)

“…C) MA plot of small RNA alterations in Flag-Ago2 siCon compared to Flag-Ago2 siXRN2. Red points are significantly increased small RNAs, blue points are significantly decreased small RNAs. …”

LPS affects the expression of tight-junction proteins. by Jinhui Zhang (693741)

“…<p>LPS affects the expression of tight-junction proteins. (<b>A</b>) qRT-PCR shows mRNA expression for ZO-1, occludin, and ve-cadherin in control and LPS treated animals (**P<0.01, *P <0.05). …”

Effect of ECFCs and astrocytes-ECFCs on 3D GBM migration. by R. Marisol Herrera-Perez (4993793)

“…The highest migration velocity was observed at the beginning and decreased over time. Migration data represents a population of 250–2500 individual cells from at least 2 independent repetitions for GBM only and from 3 replicates for ECFC and ECFC-Ast. …”

Time-dependent TGFβ effects on TER in the BEB <i>in vitro</i> model. by Angelika Stammler (483878)

“…<p>TGFβs decreased epithelial barrier in a time-dependent manner. …”

Impact of pathogen shedding characteristics on estimation accuracy. by Yun Lin (77976)

“…Gray dashed lines in the background mark the minimum and maximum median AUC across the four pathogen scenarios serving as visual reference points for easier comparison. (C-F) trajectories of viral shedding until the time of detection for 200 randomly selected individuals infected with pathogen 1-4 corresponding to examples shown in <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013527#pcbi.1013527.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1C</a>, and in different epidemic periods as indicated in panel A (left panels: increasing epidemic, period 1; middle panels: epidemic peak, period 2; right panels: decreasing epidemic, period 3). …”