Search alternatives:
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a we » a web (Expand Search), a e (Expand Search), a de (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a we » a web (Expand Search), a e (Expand Search), a de (Expand Search)
-
17481
-
17482
-
17483
Mechanical parameters.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17484
CSM.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17485
Fitting curve between CSSM and angle.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17486
Stress-strain curves under different sizes.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17487
Fit curve graph.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17488
Fit curve graph.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17489
Simulation schemes.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17490
Calculation model diagram.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17491
Characteristic size values.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17492
Fitting curve of CSM and rock bridge angle.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17493
Parameters c and d.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17494
Changing landscape configuration demands ecological planning: Retrospect and prospect for megaherbivores of North Bengal
Published 2019“…The present study also involves evaluation of landscape and anthropogenic predictors influence on the megaherbivores of GNP, followed by future landcover simulation for the year 2028. The result shows a significant decrease in the grassland cover from 18.87 km<sup>2</sup> to 8.27 km<sup>2</sup> from 1998 to 2018, whereas the woodland cover has increased from 50.14 km<sup>2</sup> to 62.09 km<sup>2</sup> between 1998 and 2018. …”
-
17495
Accurate Modeling of Water Clusters with Density-Functional Theory Using Atom-Centered Potentials
Published 2017“…However, the ability of the BHandHLYP/ACP approach to predict accurate binding energies deteriorates as the size of the basis sets decreases. Nevertheless, ACPs improve predicted binding energies by as much as a factor of 50 across the range of the basis sets studied. …”
-
17496
Accurate Modeling of Water Clusters with Density-Functional Theory Using Atom-Centered Potentials
Published 2017“…However, the ability of the BHandHLYP/ACP approach to predict accurate binding energies deteriorates as the size of the basis sets decreases. Nevertheless, ACPs improve predicted binding energies by as much as a factor of 50 across the range of the basis sets studied. …”
-
17497
Accurate Modeling of Water Clusters with Density-Functional Theory Using Atom-Centered Potentials
Published 2017“…However, the ability of the BHandHLYP/ACP approach to predict accurate binding energies deteriorates as the size of the basis sets decreases. Nevertheless, ACPs improve predicted binding energies by as much as a factor of 50 across the range of the basis sets studied. …”
-
17498
-
17499
-
17500
<b>The role of the </b><b>LncRNA </b><b>XIST/miR-15a-5p/ MN1</b><b>signaling </b><b>axis in gender disparities in bladder cancer prognosis</b>
Published 2025“…<p dir="ltr">Through comprehensive analysis of the GSE13507 and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohorts, we identified the X chromosome gene long non-coding RNA (LncRNA) X-inactive specific transcript (XIST) as a critical factor in BC sex disparity. …”