Showing 121 - 140 results of 24,172 for search '(( 50 ((mean decrease) OR (((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ) OR ( 10 min decrease ))', query time: 0.53s Refine Results
  1. 121

    A Wearable Dual-Modal Patch for Rapid Pre-Hospital Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Kuo Yang (280921)

    Published 2025
    “…The time required for diagnosing ischemia was significantly reduced to 50 min after its onset. The patch is optimally integrated into a stamp-sized band-aid, accompanied by a smartphone app for data visualization and real-time analysis. …”
  2. 122

    A Wearable Dual-Modal Patch for Rapid Pre-Hospital Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Kuo Yang (280921)

    Published 2025
    “…The time required for diagnosing ischemia was significantly reduced to 50 min after its onset. The patch is optimally integrated into a stamp-sized band-aid, accompanied by a smartphone app for data visualization and real-time analysis. …”
  3. 123

    A Wearable Dual-Modal Patch for Rapid Pre-Hospital Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Kuo Yang (280921)

    Published 2025
    “…The time required for diagnosing ischemia was significantly reduced to 50 min after its onset. The patch is optimally integrated into a stamp-sized band-aid, accompanied by a smartphone app for data visualization and real-time analysis. …”
  4. 124
  5. 125
  6. 126

    Datasheet1_Impact of lockdown on children with type-1 diabetes: returning to the community was associated with a decrease in HbA1c.pdf by Benjamin Morat (17677977)

    Published 2023
    “…No significant difference was observed between medians of HbA1c_mean and HbA1c_after values (8.37% [7.88; 9.32%] vs. 8.50% [7.70; 9.50%], respectively; p = 0.391). …”
  7. 127

    Datasheet2_Impact of lockdown on children with type-1 diabetes: returning to the community was associated with a decrease in HbA1c.pdf by Benjamin Morat (17677977)

    Published 2023
    “…No significant difference was observed between medians of HbA1c_mean and HbA1c_after values (8.37% [7.88; 9.32%] vs. 8.50% [7.70; 9.50%], respectively; p = 0.391). …”
  8. 128
  9. 129
  10. 130
  11. 131
  12. 132
  13. 133
  14. 134
  15. 135
  16. 136
  17. 137
  18. 138
  19. 139
  20. 140