Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
e decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
3d point » end point (Expand Search), _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search)
_ e » _ em (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
e decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
3d point » end point (Expand Search), _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search)
_ e » _ em (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Viability of microencapsulated FP ICCs decreased with time post-transplantation.
Published 2013“…<p>A) Fluorescent images of encapsulated FP ICCs stained with 6-CFDA for viable cells (green) and PI for non-viable cells (red) to assess viability at (A) pre-transplantation, (B) day 1, (C) day 3, (D) day 7, (E) day 14 and (F) day 21 post-transplantation. …”
-
3
Rac1 activity decreases in the presence of DECMA-1 and E-cadherin:Fc in 3-D cell aggregates.
Published 2011“…Blocking E-cadherin or addition of exogenous E-cadherin:Fc decreased Rac1 activity levels. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Rac1 activity rapidly decreases upon cell-cell adhesion in 3-D cell aggregates.
Published 2011“…Bar graph shows quantification of E-cadherin fluorescence intensity at cell-cell contacts (D); error bars are SEM of 50 independent cell-cell contacts. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
AKT inhibition decreases neuroblast populations.
Published 2012“…Treatment with IGF-I restored low TUNEL-levels (e). The data are shown as the mean±SEM and the statistical significance between the different conditions was estimated by Student's t-test: *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 versus control (0S). …”
-
20
At lower concentrations, METH decreases LTP.
Published 2010“…At 0.1 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.08 [<i>n</i> = 13(5)] (Fig. 1B); at 1 µM METH, LTP was 1.50±.07 [<i>n</i> = 13(7)] (Fig. 1C); at 10 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.07 [<i>n</i> = 14(8)] (Fig. 1D); at 30 µM METH, LTP was 1.37±.06 [<i>n</i> = 15(4)] (Fig. 1E); and at 60 µM METH, LTP was 1.32±.24 [<i>n</i> = 4(2)] (Fig. 1E). …”