Search alternatives:
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
19181
-
19182
Amount and type of maternal dietary fat induced altered Pe-induced vasoconstriction in the offspring.
Published 2012“…<p>Values are mean ± SD (n = 6/group) concentration which produced 50% maximum response (EC<sub>50</sub>) such that increasing values on the y-axis correspond to decreasing vasoconstriction. …”
-
19183
Model suggests plausible scenarios for Hsp72 regulation require both reduction of p65 and IKK inhibition.
Published 2014“…The model with reduced p65 protein and interactions upstream (US, increasing inactivation rate <i>kiA20</i> 10-fold) and downstream (DS, simulated by decreasing IκBα phosphorylation rate, <i>kc2a</i>, by 6-fold) also match many qualitative features of the model. …”
-
19184
Comparison of genes upregulated after AZD8010 and Gefitinib treatment.
Published 2015“…The genes identified had either a >2 (UMSCC25 and Ca9-22) or >1.5 (584-A2) fold change in expression levels compared to the DMSO control. …”
-
19185
Characteristics of genes classified as irreversible, slowly reversible, or rapidly reversible based on their behavior in former smokers
Published 2011“…The time point that the fold change equals 1.5 (see dotted line) is defined as the time that the genes become reversible. …”
-
19186
Unspecific changes in the epigenome by propofol.
Published 2019“…<p>(<b>a</b>) The tri-methylation of H3 K27 in SH-SY5Y cells was significantly decreased by propofol [25 μg/ml], while TNFα [10 ng/ml] did not show any changes after 24 h. …”
-
19187
Sequential broadside application of 100 µM FCCP at two separate regions in the same FDB fibre.
Published 2014“…Red vertical calibration bar in <b>A</b> represents 50 µm.</p>…”
-
19188
HG module schematic.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
19189
Label data volume and label distribution.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
19190
The structure of the context guided block.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
19191
SEnet module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
19192
AC-LayeringNetV2 architecture module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
19193
Cracks included in the dataset.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
19194
Loss function comparison plot.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
19195
Edge device performance benchmarking.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
19196
Typical error cases.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
19197
Computational efficiency comparison.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
19198
-
19199
Backbone comparison in crack detection.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
19200
Statistical analysis table for ablation tests.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”