Showing 521 - 540 results of 63,688 for search '(( 50 ((mean decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 5 ((wt decrease) OR (we decrease)) ))', query time: 1.08s Refine Results
  1. 521
  2. 522

    Decrease of SMAD3 protein, but not SMAD2 in DBA iPSCs. by Jingping Ge (636557)

    Published 2015
    “…D) Western blot analysis showing slight change of p-SMAD2 level in the nuclear fractions from <i>RPS19</i> mutant compared to WT and the corrected lines. The nuclear p-SMAD2 decreased in <i>RPL5</i> mutant and corrected lines. …”
  3. 523
  4. 524

    Plot of mean vigor by group and time. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    “…There was a general trend towards increases in CS in the Heartfulness group compared to the gratitude group. …”
  5. 525

    Plot of mean Burnout by group and time. by Kunal Desai (18784208)

    Published 2024
    “…There was a general trend towards increases in CS in the Heartfulness group compared to the gratitude group. …”
  6. 526

    Loss of primary cilia and decreased nephron number in mice with Tamoxifen-induced <i>Kif3a</i> deficiency. by Lijun Chi (196000)

    Published 2013
    “…(B, B’) KIF3A co-localizes with α-AcT in both ureteric bud and metanephric mesenchyme cells in WT kidney at E13.5. …”
  7. 527
  8. 528

    MCP-1-deficiency decreased CD11c-expressing cells via impairing the production of ROS and decreased activation of PLCγ2, Akt, and ERK upon M-CSF stimulation in BMM. by Woon-Ki Kim (447798)

    Published 2013
    “…<p>BMMs from WT (open bar) and MCP-1-KO mice (oblique-lined bar) were incubated in the presence of M-CSF (30 ng/ml) with U73122 (10 µM), Akt inhibitor IV (0.3 µM), PD098059 (5 µM), DPI (50 nM), NAC (3 mM), or H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (300 µM) for 4 d (A). *, <i>P</i><0.05; ***, <i>P</i><0.001 compared with vehicle-treated WT cells. …”
  9. 529
  10. 530
  11. 531
  12. 532
  13. 533

    <i>Nf1</i> OPG mice exhibit decreased hole poking in response to a novel holeboard apparatus. by David F. Wozniak (78177)

    Published 2013
    “…(C) <i>Nf1</i> OPG mice also showed a trend toward decreased general ambulatory activity although this difference was also not significant (p = 0.053). …”
  14. 534

    S1 File - by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  15. 535

    Detailed information on field experiments. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  16. 536

    List of symbols used in this study. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  17. 537

    Data sources for calibration and evaluation. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  18. 538
  19. 539
  20. 540