Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1101
Fig 13 -
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. …”
-
1102
-
1103
-
1104
-
1105
-
1106
-
1107
-
1108
-
1109
-
1110
Results for K<sub>s</sub>/D = 3.62 × 10<sup>−4</sup>, (a) Power, (b) Frequency, and (c) Amplitude.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1111
Results for K<sub>s</sub>/D = 1.51 × 10<sup>−4</sup> (a) Power, (b) Frequency, and (c) Amplitude.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1112
-
1113
-
1114
-
1115
-
1116
-
1117
-
1118
-
1119
The mean <i>z</i>-coordinate error decreasing percentages (%) of SSI-RIK compared to EM-SFM, CSF and RIK, when the sequence sizes vary from 15 to 50 with an equal interval 5.
Published 2015“…<p>The mean <i>z</i>-coordinate error decreasing percentages (%) of SSI-RIK compared to EM-SFM, CSF and RIK, when the sequence sizes vary from 15 to 50 with an equal interval 5.…”
-
1120