Showing 1 - 20 results of 88,735 for search '(( 50 ((ms decrease) OR (_ decrease)) ) OR ((( _ e decrease ) OR ( 2012 a decrease ))))*', query time: 0.79s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    AKT inhibition decreases neuroblast populations. by Maria R. Aburto (186884)

    Published 2012
    “…SOX2 is expressed in the otic epithelial neuroblast population (a, arrowhead) and it is significantly increased in presence of IGF-I (b, arrowhead, e) but it is markedly reduced in the presence of either AKTi or LY (c and d, arrowheads, e). …”
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Que decreases the number of infiltrating T cells in spinal cord. by Feng Mei (143817)

    Published 2012
    “…<b>E–G</b>: CD8<sup>+</sup> cells display a similar decrease after Que treatment (N = 5, *, <i>p<</i>0.05), but the overall extent of CD8<sup>+</sup> cells detected was much less than that of CD4<sup>+</sup> cells. …”
  13. 13

    Decreased E/I synapse ratio and loss of cortico-LA synaptic plasticity in the absence of coronin 1. by Rajesh Jayachandran (542641)

    Published 2014
    “…Strong cortico-LA LTP was induced in wild-type [WT (grey symbols), <i>n</i> = 12, <i>p</i><0.05 versus baseline, <i>p</i><0.05 versus Cor 1 −/− (red symbols), Student's <i>t</i> test), but not in coronin 1–deficient mice [Cor 1 −/− (red), <i>n</i> = 7, <i>p</i>>0.05 versus baseline, Student's <i>t</i> test]. Scale bars, 50 pA and 20 ms. (G) Synaptic transmission and PPR in wild-type (left) and coronin 1–deficient mice (right) in the presence of forskolin. …”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity. by Ghattas Bisharat (20706928)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(a) Left: noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PPys cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 285 neurons, mean ± SE). Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”
  20. 20