Showing 181 - 200 results of 31,133 for search '(( 50 ((ms decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 100 ((ns decrease) OR (we decrease)) ))', query time: 1.04s Refine Results
  1. 181
  2. 182
  3. 183
  4. 184
  5. 185
  6. 186

    Estimated time (in days) required for a decrease of the viral titer by 1 log<sub>10</sub> TCID<sub>50</sub>/mL. by Camille Lebarbenchon (122050)

    Published 2011
    “…<p>Estimated time (in days) required for a decrease of the viral titer by 1 log<sub>10</sub> TCID<sub>50</sub>/mL.…”
  7. 187

    OP50 <i>E. coli</i>-fed nematodes are generally healthy while pathogen-fed worms demonstrate a decrease in overall health. by Michelle R. Bond (669241)

    Published 2014
    “…(B) The average pumping rate for nematodes fed <i>P. aeruginosa</i> is decreased when compared to N2 animals fed OP50. Worms with a <i>pmk-1(km25)</i> background exhibit the largest decrease in pumping rate. …”
  8. 188
  9. 189

    The schematic diagram of the SD decrease and CNR increase rates by 50% ASiR and MBIR (compared with those by FBP). by Peigang Ning (541890)

    Published 2014
    “…<p>As the mA value decreased, MBIR brought about gradually augmented variations in the two parameters, whereas 50% ASiR did not give rise to noticeable variations.…”
  10. 190
  11. 191

    Trial profile. by Chanel Avenant (409756)

    Published 2024
    “…Both contraceptives substantially decreased, from D0 to 25W, the total testosterone [DMPA-IM D0 0.560, 25W 0.423 nmol/L, -24.3% (p < 0.0001); NET-EN D0 0.551, 25W 0.253 nmol/L, -54.1%, (p < 0.0001)], SHBG [DMPA-IM D0 45.0, 25W 32.7 nmol/L, -29.8% (p < 0.0001); NET-EN D0 50.2, 25W 17.6 nmol/L, -65.1% (p < 0.0001)], and calculated free testosterone levels [DMPA-IM D0 6.87, 25W 5.38 pmol/L, -17.2% (p = 0.0371); NET-EN D0 6.00, 25W 3.70, -40.0% (p < 0.0001)]. …”
  12. 192

    Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area [33]. by Katie Frerker (680803)

    Published 2014
    “…</p><p>Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115843#pone.0115843-Wiegmann1" target="_blank">[33]</a>.…”
  13. 193
  14. 194
  15. 195
  16. 196
  17. 197
  18. 198
  19. 199
  20. 200