Search alternatives:
ms decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
10 a » 10 _ (Expand Search), 10 μ (Expand Search), 19 a (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search)
ms decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
10 a » 10 _ (Expand Search), 10 μ (Expand Search), 19 a (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
Decreased activity of FASII favors the cold growth of the <i>ΔcshA</i> strain.
Published 2020“…<i>fapR</i> mRNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR using 16S rRNA as reference gene on total RNAs extracted from <i>wt</i> strain (PR01), <i>ΔcshA</i> strain (PR01-ΔcshA), and suppressor strains <i>ΔcshA/accC</i><sup><i>M385V</i></sup> (C51), <i>ΔcshA/accC</i><sup><i>T183I</i></sup> (sup30), <i>ΔcshA/accD</i><sup><i>F253V</i></sup> (sup17), <i>ΔcshA/accD</i><sup><i>A164V</i></sup> (sup16), <i>ΔcshA/birA</i><sup><i>D320F-FsX28</i></sup> (C58), <i>ΔcshA/birA</i><sup><i>R280stop</i></sup> (sup1) and <i>ΔcshA/bioY</i><sup><i>P123R-FsX1</i></sup> (C66), all at exponential growth phase in MH medium at 25°C. n = 5 for <i>ΔcshA</i>, <i>4 for wt</i> and 3 for all others. …”
-
46
-
47
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
-
59
-
60