Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
ms decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
ms decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
19681
Shape Memory Superelastic Poly(isocyanurate-urethane) Aerogels (PIR-PUR) for Deployable Panels and Biomimetic Applications
Published 2017“…After the first cycle, strain recovery (a measure of fatigue) improved from 80−90% to about 100%, and the fill factor, a cumulative index of performance, reached 0.7, which is in the range of fast elastomers. …”
-
19682
Inhibition of the Hedgehog pathway partially rescues pancreas formation in pancreas with activated β-catenin signaling.
Published 2016“…Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ** p< 0.01 (one-way ANOVA). Scale bars 100 μm, (in A for A-B; in E for E-G; in H for H-J).…”
-
19683
Shape Memory Superelastic Poly(isocyanurate-urethane) Aerogels (PIR-PUR) for Deployable Panels and Biomimetic Applications
Published 2017“…After the first cycle, strain recovery (a measure of fatigue) improved from 80−90% to about 100%, and the fill factor, a cumulative index of performance, reached 0.7, which is in the range of fast elastomers. …”
-
19684
Mitochondrial ROS generated by reverse electron transport in muscles is necessary for critical period heat stress to change NMJ development.
Published 2025“…</i> 25°C control) leads to increased aCC NMJ terminal size and decreased postsynaptic GluRIIA, while not affecting subunit GluRIIB expression. …”
-
19685
Expression analysis of <i>Hmx3</i> and <i>Hmx2</i> homeobox transcription factors in <i>hb/hb</i> and control littermates.
Published 2013“…Scale bars: A,B, 0.5 mm; C–F, 100 µm. <b>G:</b> Quantitative real-time PCR of cDNA generated from RNA from E12.5 littermate embryo half heads. …”
-
19686
Shape Memory Superelastic Poly(isocyanurate-urethane) Aerogels (PIR-PUR) for Deployable Panels and Biomimetic Applications
Published 2017“…After the first cycle, strain recovery (a measure of fatigue) improved from 80−90% to about 100%, and the fill factor, a cumulative index of performance, reached 0.7, which is in the range of fast elastomers. …”
-
19687
Lanthanide Complexes of Triethylenetetramine Tetra-, Penta-, and Hexaacetamide Ligands as Paramagnetic Chemical Exchange-Dependent Saturation Transfer Contrast Agents for Magnetic...
Published 2009“…In chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer (CEST) <sup>1</sup>H NMR experiments, most of the above complexes exhibit multiple strong CEST peaks of the paramagnetically shifted amide protons spread over a >100 ppm chemical shift range. The effective CEST effect of the studied thulium complexes strongly depends on temperature and pH. …”
-
19688
Depletion of ribosome biogenesis factors inhibits the regenerative behavior of hinge cells.
Published 2022“…Controls show robust cell fate change and translocation after IR (G) but RpI135 depletion in the hinge inhibited IR-induced cell fate plasticity (I). Scale bar = 100 microns. (J) Discs such as those shown in (F-I) were quantified for total RFP<sup>-</sup>GFP<sup>+</sup> area in the pouch area as in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009989#pgen.1009989.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a> and normalized to the RFP<sup>+</sup>GFP<sup>+</sup> hinge area to account for variations in disc size. …”
-
19689
Fig 5 -
Published 2024“…As in <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011996#pcbi.1011996.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a>, the main (middle) panel shows the annual cost of treatment associated with the optimal treatment, ACT*, as a function of the target propagation speed <i>v</i> for three choices of <i>kλ</i><sub><i>0</i></sub>. …”
-
19690
Over-expression of <i>Atg1</i> in the gut, fat body and Malpighian tubules extends lifespan.
Published 2020“…<p>(A) Over-expression of Atg1 in the gut and fat body under control of the inducible <i>S</i><sub><i>1</i></sub><i>106</i> GeneSwitch driver using a range of RU concentrations. …”
-
19691
Plasma membrane vesicles (ROV) of cancer cells can produce ATP and PP<sub>i</sub> with acid gradient.
Published 2015“…<p>(A) Schematic of the experiment showing assay of bead-bound ROV. …”
-
19692
Excretion in <i>N</i>. <i>vectensis</i>.
Published 2019“…<p>(a) Ammonia excretion rates of <i>N</i>. <i>vectensis</i> before (Ctrl) and after exposure for 2 hours to 50, 100, 200, and 500 μM and after exposure for 7 days in 1mM NH<sub>4</sub>Cl (boxplot). …”
-
19693
Table3_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx
Published 2022“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
-
19694
Table5_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx
Published 2022“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
-
19695
Table1_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx
Published 2022“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
-
19696
Table2_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx
Published 2022“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
-
19697
Abnormal social communication and mounting in Katnal2-KO mice.
Published 2024“…<p>(A) Normal levels of social approach and social novelty recognition in Katnal2-KO mice (2–3 months; male) in the three-chamber test, as shown by time spent sniffing social and object targets (S1/S2, old/new social target; O, object), time spent in the chamber, and the preference index (time difference for S1–O [S2 –S1] / total time × 100). …”
-
19698
Table4_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx
Published 2022“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
-
19699
Table_1_Schistosomiasis in School Age Children in Sierra Leone After 6 Years of Mass Drug Administration With Praziquantel.DOCX
Published 2019“…Mean overall S. mansoni intensity of infection reduced to 52.8 epg (95% CI: 43.2–62.4 epg) in 2016 from 100.5 epg (95% CI: 88.7–112.3 epg) at baseline (p < 0.001). …”
-
19700
Table_1_Impact of foliar application of syringic acid on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under heavy metal stress-insights into nutrient uptake, redox homeostasis, oxidative stres...
Published 2022“…Results from the present study showed that the increasing levels of Pb in the soil decreased non-significantly (P < 0.05) shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, total chlorophyll, carotenoid content, net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, soluble sugar, reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar contents, calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>), magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>), iron (Fe<sup>2+</sup>), and phosphorus (P) contents in the roots and shoots of the plants. …”