Fig 8 - by P. R. Hut (12152350)

Fig 6 - by P. R. Hut (12152350)

Fig 4 - by P. R. Hut (12152350)

Fig 7 - by P. R. Hut (12152350)

Fig 5 - by P. R. Hut (12152350)

Fig 3 - by P. R. Hut (12152350)

Cullin1/5/4A degradation is mediated by caspase-1 during <i>Eh</i>-macrophage contact. by Attinder Chadha (11414273)

Knockdown of <i>Jmjd6a</i> leads to various eye defects in <i>Xenopus laevis</i> development. by Jee Yoon Shin (7067369)

“…<p>(A) Injection of <i>Jmjd6</i> MO results in various eye defects (normal to severe) in the injected side of embryos (red arrows) at stage 40 (n = 3). …”

VANGL2 interacts with NLRP3. by Huaji Jiang (16907514)

Myeloid knockout <i>VANGL2</i> exacerbates the progression of DSS-induced colitis in mice. by Huaji Jiang (16907514)

Excel raw data. by Michael Getie (12400923)

“…<div><p>Background</p><p>Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health problem worldwide, particularly in developing countries. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”