Fig 5 - by Amanda C. Hahn (17241106)

The polarization of a passive straight cable due to an extracellular field is anti-symmetric and decreases with the field frequency. by Florian Aspart (3366014)

TPI demalonylation at K56 decreases PPP flux in CDCP1+ CSCs and is indispensable for postchemotherapeutic recurrence. by WenChao Gao (7321640)

Reformation of oxygen gradient in a disturbed sediment. by Xuegang Mao (599968)

Subjects:

Evolution of the adjusted geometric mean plasma values of homocysteine from baseline through the 4.7 years of follow-up (with adjustment for sex, baseline plasma creatinine, type o... by Leopold K. Fezeu (5309333)

Three-, bi- and mono-functional Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell subsets decrease in HIV+ patients. by Rita Casetti (608635)

Prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) decreases brain and body weights at E14 and P0. by Danielle Sambo (6077924)

V2 vasopressin receptor abundance. by Sophie Constantin Lütken (689916)

Subjects:

<i>Ext1</i> mutant lungs exhibit a decrease in SHH-FGF10 signaling. by Hua He (120374)

“…<p>(A) qPCR analysis of key components of FGF signaling pathway in lungs from E14.5. …”

RhpMS and DrmMS dose-response curves. by Megan Leander (459603)

“…<p>RhpMS dose dependently decreased <i>R</i>. <i>prolixus</i> cardiac contractility with an EC50 ∼ 140 nM. …”

The long-term impact of sustained exposure-reducing interventions (represented by a decrease in density of female anophelines). by Azra C. Ghani (160248)

Changes in neural activity were decreased in animals pre-exposed to 5-HT and <i>mod-1</i> mutants when the worms switched their locomotive direction. by Haruka Mori (8082215)

“…<p>(A–F) the neural activity of the RID changes during the transition periods from backward to forward locomotion (A–C) and from forward to backward locomotion (D–F) in the mock (A: p = 1.5 × 10⁻⁵; D: p = 5.5 × 10⁻¹³), 5-HT exposed (B: p = 0.092; E: p = 0.79), and <i>mod-1</i> mutant (C: p = 0.081; F: p = 0.93) groups. …”

Intrathecal injection of mycolactone triggers a decrease of pro-inflammatory cytokines in spinal cord of Sham rats. by Caroline Isaac (4600654)

Cell death and reactive gliosis induced by severe IVH showed a decrease after dexamethasone treatment. by Jang Hoon Lee (5897096)

Mean value of ENSS and subscales. by Phu Dinh Vu (19429477)

Subjects:

Automated wound healing assay showing decreased motility of IL-4 treated HCAEC. by Tom Skaria (2733439)

List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”