Search alternatives:
na decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), la decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 wt » 2 wt (Expand Search), 1 wt (Expand Search)
na decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), la decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 wt » 2 wt (Expand Search), 1 wt (Expand Search)
-
17861
Computational efficiency comparison.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
17862
-
17863
Backbone comparison in crack detection.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
17864
Statistical analysis table for ablation tests.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
17865
Summary of false positives and false negatives.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
17866
PR parameter comparison chart.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
17867
RAK-Conv.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
17868
Structure of YOLOv8n.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
17869
-
17870
IRRIGATION DEFICIT STRATEGIES ON PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PRODUCTIVE PARAMETERS OF 'TOMMY ATKINS' MANGO
Published 2018“…The partial root-zone drying irrigation with 60 and 40% of ETc causes a decrease in the 'Tommy Atkins' mango yield. The regulated deficit irrigation up to 50% of ETc, applied at the fruit maturation stage, maintain the yield and water use efficiency.…”
-
17871
-
17872
-
17873
-
17874
-
17875
-
17876
-
17877
Figure S1 - E2A Predicts Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients and Regulates Cancer Cell Growth by Targeting miR-320a
Published 2014“…Right: Change of E2A expression in SW480 cells after transfection of shE2A, E12 or E47: shE2A reduced the expression of E2A in SW480, while E12 and E47 increased E2A expression in SW480/shE2A cells, relative to the controls; (B) Transfection of E12 or E47 inhibited SW480/WT cell growth; (C) E2A regulates cell growth in NCM460 cells; (D) Transfection of E12 or E47 increased G<sub>0</sub>/G<sub>1</sub> phase of SW480/WT cells and decreased the S phase; (E) E2A regulates cell cycle progression in NCM460 cells; (F) Transfection of E12 or E47 upregulated the expression of miR-320a, compared to negative control. …”
-
17878
-
17879
Metformin does not further increase the median lifespan of DR-constitutive mutant eat-2, and metformin treatment triggers several DR phenotypes in wild-type <i>C. elegans</i> witho...
Published 2010“…<p><b>A.</b> Survival curves of <i>eat-2(ad1116)</i> mutants raised on 0 mM, 1 mM, 10 mM, and 50 mM metformin plates at 20°C. …”
-
17880
Regulation of MCF-7 mammosphere formation by breast cancer promoters and metformin.
Published 2011“…On the other hand, metformin treatment decreased MCF-7 proliferation (mean ± SD, n = 3). *, <i>P</i><0.05; **, <i>P</i><0.01; ***, <i>P</i><0.001. …”