Showing 1,421 - 1,440 results of 36,815 for search '(( 50 ((na decrease) OR (((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ) OR ( 12 mean decrease ))', query time: 1.07s Refine Results
  1. 1421
  2. 1422
  3. 1423
  4. 1424
  5. 1425
  6. 1426
  7. 1427
  8. 1428
  9. 1429
  10. 1430
  11. 1431

    Stability scores with refinement, no USM decreases, no W. by Jedediah M. Singer (10331212)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Effects of guided and random substitutions within GM designs with a maximum sequence identity to any expert-designed protein of less than 50%, when guided substitutions are not permitted to decrease USM EC<sub>50</sub> predictions and neither guided nor random substitutions are allowed to change amino acids to tryptophan.…”
  12. 1432
  13. 1433
  14. 1434

    Stability scores with refinement, no USM decreases, no AFILMVWY. by Jedediah M. Singer (10331212)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Effects of guided and random substitutions within GM designs with a maximum sequence identity to any expert-designed protein of less than 50%, when guided substitutions are not permitted to decrease USM EC<sub>50</sub> predictions and neither guided nor random substitutions are allowed to change amino acids to alanine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, valine, tryptophan, or tyrosine.…”
  15. 1435
  16. 1436
  17. 1437
  18. 1438
  19. 1439

    Regenerating axons are increased by ATRA and decreased by clodronate. by Valeria De La Rosa-Reyes (6658613)

    Published 2021
    “…(A) Low magnification maximum intensity projection of the complete nerve from a PBS-treated animal, composited from several 12 μm sections, with the retina (ret) on the left and the distal stump (dist) on the right. …”
  20. 1440

    S1 File - by Chantelle M. de Vet (16535257)

    Published 2024
    “…The student’s RV-GLS consistency was poor during the first 25 measurements, moderate-to good during the second 25 measurements and again poor-to-moderate during the final 50 measurements. Repeated measurements analysis showed a significant decrease in variability of the LV- and RV-GLS score differences between the expert and trainees over time (<i>p</i><sub>adj</sub><0.001), which was not significantly different between trainees. …”