Showing 29,901 - 29,920 results of 48,367 for search '(( 50 ((ng decrease) OR (((a decrease) OR (mean decrease)))) ) OR ( 12 we decrease ))', query time: 1.27s Refine Results
  1. 29901
  2. 29902

    Colony formation assay. by Vincent E. Baldanza (8781671)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>(A) Abrams, D-17, and HMPOS canine OSA cell lines treated with vehicle control (DMSO), 33% of the respective determined IC<sub>50</sub> dose of vismodegib (10 μM for Abrams and HMPOS; 15 μM for D-17), 66% of the respective determined IC<sub>50</sub> dose of vismodegib (20 μM for Abrams and HMPOS; 30 μM for D-17), and the full determined IC<sub>50</sub> dose of vismodegib (30 μM for Abrams and HMPOS; 45 μM for D-17). …”
  3. 29903

    V3-peptide depletion of SF162 neutralization. by Ilja Bontjer (426978)

    Published 2013
    “…<sup>a</sup> Values represent 50% neutralization titers in the presence of irrelevant peptide. …”
  4. 29904
  5. 29905

    Image7_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  6. 29906

    Image8_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  7. 29907

    Image9_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  8. 29908

    Image3_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  9. 29909

    Image4_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  10. 29910

    Image1_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  11. 29911

    Image6_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  12. 29912

    Image5_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  13. 29913

    Image2_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  14. 29914
  15. 29915

    Fasting/Refeeding Cycles Prevent Myocardial Dysfunction and Morphology Damage in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats by Matheus Fécchio Pinotti (5669387)

    Published 2018
    “…The level of significance considered was 5% (a = 0.05). Results: The RF rats presented lower cardiac atrophy than R50 in relation to C rats. …”
  16. 29916

    Fasting/Refeeding Cycles Prevent Myocardial Dysfunction and Morphology Damage in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats by Matheus Fécchio Pinotti (5669387)

    Published 2018
    “…The level of significance considered was 5% (a = 0.05). Results: The RF rats presented lower cardiac atrophy than R50 in relation to C rats. …”
  17. 29917
  18. 29918
  19. 29919
  20. 29920